Mickey and Minnie’s Runaway Railway - Disneyland

Disney Irish

Premium Member
How could it not be subjective? I never said it wasn’t subjective at all. I said that it’s more objective than we like to realize. The majority of fans will agree on which attractions are E tickets. That alone is proof that there is a modern set of criteria we go by to determine what an E ticket is. Some of them are scale, length, thrill etc..

I just happen to be in the minority in my opinion of Falcon and Star Tours. Partly because I think both of these attractions are anomalies in that they are both very well themed (Falcon to a lesser extent) screen attractions. But at the end of the day you are still just being moved around in front of a small screen and it would be wrong to put them in the same category as the likes of POTC, HM, Indy etc..

I feel like you want to make this black and white and I’m saying come play in the gray area with me.
I can agree its shades of gray which is why I said its subjective. Its based on what people perceive as an E-Ticket to them personally.

So I've asked you (albeit in a different way), what is that criteria in which to determine the definitive list of modern E-Tickets?

And I add to it these questions:

Is your criteria different than mine, or anyone else's here? Who determines what "THE" list is? Who determines when one attraction gets demoted to a lower classification? Who determines when one attraction can get promoted (as Disney did back in the day) because of say upgrades? Who says that one persons E-Ticket classification is any more valid than anyone else's?

These questions alone indicate its not objective, but rather subjective. This is because there is no authority over it besides Disney and they don't use the classification anymore.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
An E-Ticket thread already exists which documents ticket levels historically...

 

mickEblu

Well-Known Member
I can agree its shades of gray which is why I said its subjective. Its based on what people perceive as an E-Ticket to them personally.

So I've asked you (albeit in a different way), what is that criteria in which to determine the definitive list of modern E-Tickets?

And I add to it these questions:

Is your criteria different than mine, or anyone else's here? Who determines what "THE" list is? Who determines when one attraction gets demoted to a lower classification? Who determines when one attraction can get promoted (as Disney did back in the day) because of say upgrades? Who says that one persons E-Ticket classification is any more valid than anyone else's?

These questions alone indicate its not objective, but rather subjective. This is because there is no authority over it besides Disney and they don't use the classification anymore.

Perhaps you forgot my original post below which sparked this whole discussion. What do you disagree with about this post?

Also I was referring to fans not Disney so not sure why your bringing them up.

To answer your question we all mostly have the same criteria which why we mostly have the same answers as to what are E tickets at DL.

0A8F73FA-EE12-4D49-8A82-7141134346CD.jpeg
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
I personally do not use the ticketing system for my judgement call in quality, it’s an evaluation of scope and scale only to me.

For example, Tokyo’s Hunny Hunt is largely better than what many would consider E-ticket attractions, but to me it’s a D-ticket. It’s a wonderfully gussied up and supremely well done fantasyland style ride, it’s a bit longer than the bus bar rides (mostly C-tickets), but it’s still only four minutes and more of a medium scale. This seems like blasphemy to many, but when the 8 minute long beauty and the beast opens with a similar ride system next door, people will realize the scope and scale is different. Heck people may still even prefer Pooh, but it’s still a D-ticket.

In my brain I then add a +/neutral/- as a partial quality call.

Pooh’s Hunny Hunt is of an illustrious category of D+ tickets. There aren’t many, just like there aren’t many E+ tickets. This allows Pooh to be a leading class example without burdening it to the same standard on other E-tickets.

So you might call Haunted Mansion/POTC an E+ as different leading examples in their class.

So semantic aside, the scope and scale of Smugglers run is still an E-ticket. But for some here the differentiator is whether it’s an E or a small group might say E (minus)... but it’s still an E-ticket for scope and scale.


Roping it back in, Mickeys Runnaway railway is actually bigger than Mystic Manor and has more scenes. I suspect it may run longer than 5 minutes too. It’s easily an E-ticket. That doesn’t mean people may actually like the end product, but it’s a relatively large attraction occupying a large show building.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
Perhaps you forgot my original post below which sparked this whole discussion. What do you disagree with about this post?

Also I was referring to fans not Disney so not sure why your bringing them up.

To answer your question we all mostly have the same criteria which why we mostly have the same answers as to what are E tickets at DL.

View attachment 403041
In which I replied:

Please tell me what the modern qualifications are, because from what I understand they too are subjective based on who you talk to.

And you've never answered me. You're the one that said there are consistent qualifications on it, your words. So I ask again what are those qualifications? Your recent "answer" is just another way to say we all agree. But what is that in which we all agree on, which is the standard qualification?
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
I mentioned a few in another post... scope, scale, ride time, immersion (😒) ...
I must have missed that, because in no post do I see it listed.

Ok, so by that small set of qualifications, both MF:SR and MMRR would be E-Tickets plain and simple. You can subjectively say MF:SR doesn't meet x or y based on your own personal take on it, but in reality it does.

Anyways I’m kind of bored with this topic. We’ve gone around enough on it.
 
Last edited:

mickEblu

Well-Known Member
I must have missed that, because in no post do I see it listed.

Ok, so by that small set of qualifications, both MF:SR and MMRR would be E-Tickets plain and simple. You can subjectively say MF:SR doesn't meet x or y based on your own personal take on it, but in reality it does.

How does MF:SR meet the scale criteria? The ride experience. Not the Empty warehouse of a queue.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
How does MF:SR meet the scale criteria? The ride experience. Not the Empty warehouse of a queue.
It depends on where you define where the ride experience starts. To me it starts when you meet Hondo, not just when you board the ship. In which I say that it’s a larger in scale due to all the extras you get.
 

mharrington

Well-Known Member
If we could get this topic back on track from deviating into a debate about what constitutes an E ticket that is really going nowhere...

What I would like to say does not really pertain to Mickey and Minnie's Runaway Railway per se, but it does relate to Toontown, which I hope gets the TLC it needs. As we all agree, something needs to be done about Donald and Goofy's places. In the case of Goofy's house, I think a copy of Goofy's Paint n Playhouse from Tokyo would be neat:
gph444013LARGE.jpg


I don't think it takes up a lot of space (any more than the original Bounce House did), and it would be fun for everyone to do. That said, considering it's a Tokyo original, I'm not sure if the OLC will allow the concept to be replicated outside of the Tokyo resort.
 

mickEblu

Well-Known Member
Curious if Gadget survives a Toontown refresh. I would prefer it gets some TLC but in this IP era it would be odd if it stuck around.
 

mharrington

Well-Known Member
Well responding to my question I asked you which was on topic could have helped. Lol

Yes, but it probably wouldn't have made a difference anyway. It still would have devolved into a multi-page, back-and-forth debate about what was and was not an E ticket.

Anyway, there was no insider source to back this up. I was just making a guess.
 

mharrington

Well-Known Member
It could always be rethemed to Duck Tales. Maybe some kind of Gizmo Duck ride.

Or maybe it could be themed around Ludwig Von Drake, who is testing out new inventions and needs you, the rider, to be his test subject.

You also never did answer my question about whether Goofy's Paint and Playhouse, being a Tokyo original, would/could be replicated outside the Tokyo resort.
 

Phroobar

Well-Known Member
Or maybe it could be themed around Ludwig Von Drake, who is testing out new inventions and needs you, the rider, to be his test subject.
Ludwig Von Drake is far too old and obscure for any 5-9 year old to know. They would know the characters from Duck Tales. Disney should bring back Rescue Rangers in order to make Gadget relative again.
You also never did answer my question about whether Goofy's Paint and Playhouse, being a Tokyo original, would/could be replicated outside the Tokyo resort.
It's just a light show display with guns similar to what use to be in the Imagination pavilion and Disney Quest. I don't think it's a problem. It's not a ride or a real attraction and the building is exactly the same as the DL one. I think they would do it if TDA thought about it.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom