Yert3
Well-Known Member
So your logic is "metal detectors don't stop everything, so let's just get rid of them?"How do metal detectors stop something like Nice or Berlin? Look up how often TSA fails to find weapons in internal tests.
So your logic is "metal detectors don't stop everything, so let's just get rid of them?"How do metal detectors stop something like Nice or Berlin? Look up how often TSA fails to find weapons in internal tests.
They stop barely anything. 5% - 10% success rates are not usually considered success.So your logic is "metal detectors don't stop everything, so let's just get rid of them?"
Then security needs to be increased. Why not send our bags through an X-ray machine like at Disneyland Paris?They stop barely anything. 5% - 10% success rates are not usually considered success.
Because this is Disney World, not an airport. The metal detectors are a deterrent, not an end all be all to security.Then security needs to be increased. Why not send our bags through an X-ray machine like at Disneyland Paris?
It is TSA screening with the 5% - 10% success rate. That means x-rays and body scans aren't even working. There is no level to which you can increase security. The type of attacks this sort of security is in response to keeps shifting methodology to avoid such security.Then security needs to be increased. Why not send our bags through an X-ray machine like at Disneyland Paris?
DLP does it. We can too.Because this is Disney World, not an airport. The metal detectors are a deterrent, not an end all be all to security.
So you would just prefer it if security just didn't exist at all since it fails most of the time? Is this seriously what you're saying?It is TSA screening with the 5% - 10% success rate. That means x-rays and body scans aren't even working. There is no level to which you can increase security. The type of attacks this sort of security is in response to keeps shifting methodology to avoid such security.
Yes. Would you live in a house built by a contractor who sees 9 out of 10 of his houses fall down? Would you go to a lawyer who at best only wins 10% of his cases? Would you insist you passed an exam with only 10% of the questions answered correctly? We're way past failing most of the time, generally 10% at best would be total failure.So you would just prefer it if security just didn't exist at all since it fails most of the time? Is this seriously what you're saying?
-High amount of inconvenienceSo you would just prefer it if security just didn't exist at all since it fails most of the time? Is this seriously what you're saying?
MK has a spillover line that doesn't get scanned making this an absurdly inconvenient and blatant security theater.
I don't care if is there mellacious intent or not. You don't need a f'ing gun at Disney, or the grocery store, or the theatre. Gun nuts are out of their minds. No wonder the rest of the world laughs at us.There was no foul play here.....people breaking the rules sure and to some degree laws? (I believe the lawyer guy had an expired licence to carry) But in both of those cases there was no mellacious intent....Ala shoot the park up.
It's Florida guns are common....get over it.
A good example of how effective it may be you need not look far. The TSA the beacon of American flight safety has an insane failure rate on finding hidden "fake" bombs and weapons the FBI trys sending through. (It's part of testing)
The intent is what these screenings are supposed to stop...I don't care if is there mellacious intent or not. You don't need a f'ing gun at Disney, or the grocery store, or the theatre. Gun nuts are out of their minds. No wonder the rest of the world laughs at us.
Obviously. But I don't even want someone with a gun inside the parks even if they don't intend to use it. I see enough gun toting morons outside Disney.The intent is what these screenings are supposed to stop...
That's fine, but that is not being accomplished.Obviously. But I don't even want someone with a gun inside the parks even if they don't intend to use it. I see enough gun toting morons outside Disney.
I don't care if is there mellacious intent or not. You don't need a f'ing gun at Disney, or the grocery store, or the theatre. Gun nuts are out of their minds. No wonder the rest of the world laughs at us.
Because Disney isn't serious about really keeping guns and knives out. The fact is you set the sensitivity of the detector high enough and it would go off from the rivets in your Levis, but that would impede the flow of people too much and Disney would lose money. The whole charade is to make people that are nervous feel like Disney is doing something to make them safe.... But once someone sneaks in with a gun and mows down a bunch of people the lawyers will hit Disney even harder because it will come out that they had the metal detectors and made a conscious decision to basically turn them off.I am worried about their reliability. I once forgot to take my keys and phone out of my pockets and the detector didn't go off. It didn't even click with me until a few minutes later.
How do you know they are morons? They might be responsible and legal gun carrying citizens.Obviously. But I don't even want someone with a gun inside the parks even if they don't intend to use it. I see enough gun toting morons outside Disney.
If they're illicitly carrying in Disney and not even turning around when they see a metal detector, they're obviously not bright enough to carry.How do you know they are morons? They might be responsible and legal gun carrying citizens.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.