Didn't this happen sometime in the summer too?
Edit- it happened at the Magic Kingdom in August. Different scenario, still glad that nothing terrible happened.
http://forums.wdwmagic.com/threads/...r-magic-kingdom-with-gun.916563/#post-7348902
I somewhat agree, but the person with the permit is responsible to know where he or she is allowed to carry with the permit.In fairness, the policy isn't very explicit, you really have to go looking for it. I know several people who (legally) carry a firearm wherever they go, including both men and women. For legal permit holders, especially those who hold a Florida permit, Disney needs to do a better job of communicating that the permit doesn't apply on Disney's private property.
This is true, however people with a permit are legally allowed to carry a concealed gun into WDW. This is simply a Disney rule, carrying a gun into WDW is no different than carrying a selfie stick in. No one could possibly know what every single business allows and doesn't allow. There are likely people in the park every day carrying guns who don't even know it's not allowed.I somewhat agree, but the person with the permit is responsible to know where he or she is allowed to carry with the permit.
I'm avoiding addressing most of this because I don't feel this is valid part of this discussion, but I wanted to make one point that a lot of people look at the wrong way. Police to not shoot to kill or harm, they are trained to shoot to stop. The intent isn't to kill the person involved in violence but to stop them from continuing.
Even with 100% screening the odds are plenty good that the screening can be circumvented.If EVERYONE went through a metal detector, then the even people with a concealed carry permit may not feel the need to try to bring protection with them. When security is random, there will ALWAYS be those that are willing to take the odds.
Let's clarify shoot to stop. Officers are trained to "shoot to stop," by aiming for the center mass of a person's chest because it is the target they are most certain to hit and is most likely to take the suspect down. Fortunately or unfortunately depending on your point of view, it is also most likely to kill the suspect.
This is true, this is why I suggested it should be all or nothing. At least if everyone's going through a metal detector we know that no one is bringing in a metal weapon outside of somehow circumventing the security checkpoint. This wouldn't necessarily stop someone planning some sort of pre-planned attack. It would however stop the in the moment type incidents that could occur, for example someone gets into an argument things get escalated and one person pulls out the weapon that no one told them wasn't allowed. As it stands now the security is a joke and just waste of everyone's time.Even with 100% screening the odds are plenty good that the screening can be circumvented.
Thank you Mom.This has again turned into an argument about firearms. Unless someone has something "new" to add to the original report, consider the topic closed. Thank you.
Thats because lightsabers are a more elegant weapon for a civilised ageNo one stopped me with my light saber today...
Metal detectors don't necessarily mean guns aren't allowed
You were saying?This has again turned into an argument about firearms. Unless someone has something "new" to add to the original report, consider the topic closed. Thank you.
Mickey in the Haunted Mansion with a Candle Stick?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.