Main Street U.S.A. hub redevelopment at the Magic Kingdom

Sage of Time

Well-Known Member
I've got photos going back decades and there are significantly fewer trees everywhere in the MK than there used to be (in all stages of growth). Recall trees take up a few hundred square feet each which can be used for merch carts/parade viewing
I'd like to see the photos. Beyond the hub, I really don't know where else tree removal has taken place.
 

note2001

Well-Known Member
Permit runs until this November, So July would be 'Good Thing' (tm)

Keeping in mind that June/July/August are known for their afternoon downpours, I'd think they'd want to have all the dirt moving & path development done well before then.

The November expiration date for the permit makes me hope that there may be one show element we haven't seen in their plans that will be completed and revealed by the holidays. Obviously not structural or it would be on the plans.
 
Last edited:

Sage of Time

Well-Known Member
Keeping in mind that June/July/August are known for their afternoon downpours, I'd think they'd want to have all the dirt moving & path development done well before then.

The November expiration date for the permit makes me hope that there may be one show element we haven't seen in their plans that will be completed and revealed by the holidays. Obviously not structural or it would be on the plans.
I would assume lights could be added in later... ....but a fully lit up and glittery hub to accompany the dream lights would be AMAZING. I hope they share this line of thought.
 

Little Green Men

Well-Known Member
I got a few pics of the hub today.
image.jpg

image.jpg

image.jpg

Here's the backstage area:
image.jpg
 

EdC

Well-Known Member
I believe the current location is the only place where bridges / moat work is required. Given the current pace, it'll take another 2-3 months to finish the current construction areas and then will transition to the next section closer to the castle. So the construction may be straddling the entrances to Adventureland and Tomorrowland. I'd imagine the pace for those should be about the time from a week ago till whenever the current section is complete; as the earth movement will be minimal and consist of new short walls, railings, lights and the associated greenery on top.

Looks like we're a little over half way to the 2 month time frame I predicted for the current construction. Wonder how close/far off I'll be?
 

KDM31091

Well-Known Member
They did at least save a handful of trees. It's not completely barren looking going by that photo. It IS quite a bit more barren than that it to be, but I think Disney is just responding to what they think people want. They think people want more space to view fireworks. However, the entire focus on the Magic Kingdom is NOT just fireworks. You can't demolish half of the trees and scenery in the park all because of fireworks that occur during perhaps one hour of operation time per day. I understand it's important but I think they are tipping too far towards ripping everything out for fireworks.

I miss the greenery that existed before 2005 (the first time the hub was "revamped"). It has just gotten worse and worse. It will eventually be completely treeless, there's no doubt. This is just one step closer to that. It's sad. It's not as pretty to look at without the trees, it looks like a big parking lot. And all this in the name of fireworks. What a shame :( They should at least put low shrubs or something in place of some of the trees they have ripped out. Those don't affect your viewing space above.
 

Sage of Time

Well-Known Member
Not if it blocks the fireworks. Silver lining--at least we have the twinkling lights back. Twinkling lights in the hub are quintessential MK to me.
Disneyland has none of these 'blocking fireworks' hang ups and they have a far better show and more trees and a smaller castle. I don't get it.

But YES, bring on the twinkling hub trees. Those are so lovely.
 

COProgressFan

Well-Known Member
I'd like to see the photos. Beyond the hub, I really don't know where else tree removal has taken place.

Don't really have time to dig up photos, but just off the top of my head:

1. Fantasyland had several planters removed before the expansion, a major one being in the area between the carousel and the new castle walls. While the expansion is nice and fairly lush, it seems to come at the expense of the rest of Fantasyland.

2. Some trees on Main Street have been removed completely, while others have been removed and replaced with smaller ones. I get that the trees need to be replaced over time, as they can affect the scale of the MS buildings, etc., but they are much smaller now. Trees provide a realism and depth to the MS buildings, and when you can just stare at them full on, it becomes a bit cartoony.

3. Trees in Town Square. The removal of the large trees here confuses me. First removed maybe 6 or 8 years ago (?) they were replaced with small magnolia-type trees (forgive me, I'm no arborist), then a few years back replaced again with different small trees. Considering these trees do not block any views, and were in planters that still currently exist (no gains in walkable areas for guests), I'm not sure what the motivation was here. Other than sadism for guests in sweltering Florida heat. And the benches are nearly all gone too, for good measure.

4. Other trees in Town Square, in front of Tony's/Expo Hall and City Hall. These were likely removed for crowd flow purposes.

5. Outside the park, the planter with small trees removed maybe 10 years ago for additional turnstyles, as well as trees removed outside the monorail station, (some of which fell during hurricanes) and never replaced.

Again, just off the top of my head.
 

Sage of Time

Well-Known Member
Don't really have time to dig up photos, but just off the top of my head:

1. Fantasyland had several planters removed before the expansion, a major one being in the area between the carousel and the new castle walls. While the expansion is nice and fairly lush, it seems to come at the expense of the rest of Fantasyland.

2. Some trees on Main Street have been removed completely, while others have been removed and replaced with smaller ones. I get that the trees need to be replaced over time, as they can affect the scale of the MS buildings, etc., but they are much smaller now. Trees provide a realism and depth to the MS buildings, and when you can just stare at them full on, it becomes a bit cartoony.

3. Trees in Town Square. The removal of the large trees here confuses me. First removed maybe 6 or 8 years ago (?) they were replaced with small magnolia-type trees (forgive me, I'm no arborist), then a few years back replaced again with different small trees. Considering these trees do not block any views, and were in planters that still currently exist (no gains in walkable areas for guests), I'm not sure what the motivation was here. Other than sadism for guests in sweltering Florida heat. And the benches are nearly all gone too, for good measure.

4. Other trees in Town Square, in front of Tony's/Expo Hall and City Hall. These were likely removed for crowd flow purposes.

5. Outside the park, the planter with small trees removed maybe 10 years ago for additional turnstyles, as well as trees removed outside the monorail station, (some of which fell during hurricanes) and never replaced.

Again, just off the top of my head.
I'll give you the Main Street and hub ones, as those drive me nuts, too, but I think the Fantasyland ones were moved around for New Fantasyland and the mess that it created.

I will say that there are some new planters over by Village Haus, so that's nice.

My main point, though, about Liberty Square, Adventureland, and Frontierland, though, still being lush and green, and really inviting, goes unchallenged. I'd love to see some evidence that trees were killed off over there.

And honestly, if they were, it doesn't show!
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom