*sigh*
Erm, I suppose I should now say that 'You should be organising petitions for repairing the broken effects on Splash not complaining about JKR's opinion of Starbucks etc etc'.
But I won't. Because, what is with that nonsense in this thread all the time? Because there are broken effects on Splash one can't have an opinion on Starbucks? Worse, only a positive one? Can we have an opinion about BoG's menu? Must we lock all threads on this forum and only talk about Splash until that one is fully repaired? And then stop all talk about Test Track until Everest is repaired or something? What sillyness. This is the Starbucks on Ms thread, we discuss Starbucks on MS here, not Splash. Not the civil war in Syria. Nor anything else that is more important in the grand scheme of things. Enough with that lunacy already.
Me, I don't like the look of the Pig café in DCA. I don't like to walk into a Starbucks in an early 20th century setting, not even a Starbucks with an early 20th century theme, nor even a Disney period café with a Starbucks menu. It's a thematic intrusion, an ill-fit. I'm simply not easily satisfied. I don't want the chain, I want the unique, boutique experience. DTD is for outside chains to set up shop. The parks ought to be one step up from that.
I'm all for Disney replacing its coffee for better quality coffee. This is not it. This is one location in each park being changed for marketing purposes. If the goal is to improve coffee in the parks, then...coffee would be improved in the parks. (Which incidentally WDW is not going to do, because many fans of better coffee are happy to settle for one location, blindly supporting a deal for Disney which in fact decreases Disney's impetus to introduce better coffee across the parks!)
If the goal is better fried products in the park, then the solution isn't one McDonald's marketing location in Frontierland. No, the solution is better oil and better potatoes across the park.