Is it?
The first one is based in 1982... the sequel is based around 2010. Yes it looks futuristic, but its really the past.
As long as you get a good skipper. If not, it's just IASW in the Jungle.Well, because it IS a historically significant attraction in Disney history.. but ALSO, because it is still quite popular. It’s continued popularity debunks your opinions as it is. It’s a solid entertaining attraction. Simple as that. Not every attraction has to appeal to you (as long as it is appealing to the vast majority of theme park guests).
I agree. Luckily, It’s hard to get a bad skipper since monotone skippers are actually the funniest ones.As long as you get a good skipper. If not, it's just IASW in the Jungle.
Well, because it IS a historically significant attraction in Disney history.. but ALSO, because it is still quite popular. It’s continued popularity debunks your opinions as it is. It’s a solid entertaining attraction. Simple as that. Not every attraction has to appeal to you (as long as it is appealing to the vast majority of theme park guests).
I’ll just say I’m glad you guys are not in charge of “fixing” it!
There are poorer attractions that are less popular and need more work. Tiki Room being one of those.Yes it is historically significant. But I think Jungle Cruise is the prime example of a museum item. I actually like Jungle Cruise. But the fact is that Disney could do much better with that space if we ignore JC being a classic. Jungle Cruise is one of the most dated attractions on property imo.
I don't know that I want it gone but a better attraction could certainly be made. I think it's fun but think about what we could havw its place... additionally, I suppose something could be added separately from it without its destruction.
There are poorer attractions that are less popular and need more work. Tiki Room being one of those.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.