devoy1701
Well-Known Member
the artwork had a slightly different roof (with some wing-like structures)...perhaps we will see some aesthetic additions here.We can hope, but I doubt it when it just got re-done in 2010.
the artwork had a slightly different roof (with some wing-like structures)...perhaps we will see some aesthetic additions here.We can hope, but I doubt it when it just got re-done in 2010.
Just a guess. The roof that is on there now has always looked temporary, even though the major replacement was cut from the FLE budget long ago.
OK, this is better. See the new roofing materials hanging over the edges and the white goo they are using to seal the new seams. We just used this on our school 2 years ago. It works so much better on pitches like this.
OK, this is better. See the new roofing materials hanging over the edges and the white goo they are using to seal the new seams. We just used this on our school 2 years ago. It works so much better on pitches like this.
Right the frame wasn't changed, just recovered. Still I guess that'd be a new roof (since the roof part would be the covering lol).Just so everyone is clear on how much was done to the roof...
Okie Dokie, splitting hairs here I see. You win.They just recovered the old roof. It's not entirely new.
Okie Dokie, splitting hairs here I see. You win.
No indeed Disney did not remove the superstructure. Then again when my house receives a new roof, I guess it then isn't a new roof either because they don't bring don't take the the superstructure of beams, frames, fascia off the house when they strip off the old roof and install a new one. When relators refer and list the age of the roof of my homes when we sold them, it wasn't the superstructure age that is listed it is what was placed upon the superstructure.
It's not entirely the same as a house roof and there is no need to be so hostile. It is pretty well known the last roof was a rush job. There were issues that couldn't wait and FLE could handle an extensive rehfurb. They may leave this roof, but in 2010, the plan was a quick fix until FLE had opened. Then the ride was supposed to go down for a lengthy refurb - which it is now doing. Things can change so we will see.
Disneyland Paris' Teacups
WDW's Teacups
WDW's Teacups is so dim and ugly while, Disneyland Paris' is so bright and not ugly.
That's what I thought!You realize you just compared Paris in the day time to Florida at night, right? Don't get me wrong, the Paris roof looks better but that's a horrible comparison.
You realize you just compared Paris in the day time to Florida at night, right? Don't get me wrong, the Paris roof looks better but that's a horrible comparison.
Sorry I posted that really quickly cause I had to go somewhere and didn't realize that. lol Sorry!That's what I thought!
It's fine, the comparison still makes sense (although it might not be as dim at daytime).Sorry I posted that really quickly cause I had to go somewhere and didn't realize that. lol Sorry!
I doubt the glass Paris roof simply because it would get gross and might be potentially dangerous in Florida's hurricane weather. Also, I get the feeling we'd all be like really hot ants under a magnifying glass in the Florida sun under there. But this is good news, because the turntable really, really needs to be painted and something's gotta be done about the jerky brakes. I don't think the roof will play into the refurb at all; I'm pretty sure the Paris roof was planned, but we got a new permanent wooden one instead, probably because of environmental problems.
Clearly this is to move the Teacups north of the carousel and between the castle walls. Pixiedustmaker has forseen it.
Pixiedustmaker knows all. Pray to your dark lord, Pixiedustmaker. Tekeli-li! Tekeli-li!
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.