AdventureHasAName
Well-Known Member
Thankfully, I have you to tell me how wrong I am.Your timeline is fiction.
Thankfully, I have you to tell me how wrong I am.Your timeline is fiction.
It must be some echo chamber, because you’re hearing things I never said. Far from claiming the bad PR doesn’t matter, I’ve stated the opposite—twice:I have been following this for weeks and not said a word. I find it incredible that @LittleBuford and @Casper Gutman can try to make their own echo chamber about anything regarding this. It is a disaster waiting to happen. Across the boards there are many saying this. The fact that the two of you want to claim it isn't does matter about the bad PR. time will tell but it will be the same outcome.
I fear it'll do badly regardless of its strengths and weaknesses. The campaign against it has received enough mainstream coverage that I think many will be put off seeing it.
Because the bad PR has gone mainstream enough that I think the film’s chances of doing well are irretrievably damaged.
I would offer two answers to this:What's inorganic?
No, but I am sure you are happy about this. You (and several others who hate the modern Disney company) are practically giddy each time a Disney film flops and are probably low-key excited that Rachel is making the bashing so easy for you this time around.You may not be happy about this, but it's real. It's happening. And this little corner backwater discussion forum, all two dozen of us, is not guiding it or controlling it. We are merely trying to catch up to what already happened on TikTok last week.
I’m curious to know what comments you’re thinking of. (Not a challenge—I’m genuinely interested!)Zegler's comments don't give me confidence in the movie.
After watching the Variety interview, it strikes me that Godot (the older, more experienced actress) was prompting Zegler to get back to the studio talking points. Those talking points being that her character is a strong female who is in charge of her destiny rather than the passive character in the 1937 animated classic. My personal impression is that Zegler is like many 22-year-olds. She has a long way to grow. As she matures, I expect more diplomatic answers to interview questions.The treatment of her remarks as outlandishly and uniquely offensive, when Gadot is right next to her in both interviews saying, “She’s not gonna be saved by the prince.”
Zegler was near the beginning of her answer when Gadot intervened with “She’s not gonna be saved by the prince”, so that isn’t my sense of what happened. You can also see Gadot and a man to her left smiling and nodding approvingly as Zegler completes her response, which merely builds on Gadot’s words. I actually think she (Zegler) comes across as quite polished and “on-script” in the Variety interview; it’s the one she did for Extra TV, where she compared the prince to a stalker, that strayed from the Disney-approved talking points.After watching the Variety interview, it strikes me that Godot (the older, more experienced actress) was prompting Zegler to get back to the studio talking points. Those talking points being that her character is a strong female who is in charge of her destiny rather than the passive character in the 1937 animated classic. My personal impression is that Zegler is like many 22-year-olds. She has a long way to grow. As she matures, I expect more diplomatic answers to interview questions.
I agree. For any actor, the requirement to stick to the talking points in all interviews should be written into their contract. Talking points are just as important as the script in movie. Actors should be talking in the third person and discuss the character and the story and keep personal opinion out of it.After watching the Variety interview, it strikes me that Godot (the older, more experienced actress) was prompting Zegler to get back to the studio talking points. Those talking points being that her character is a strong female who is in charge of her destiny rather than the passive character in the 1937 animated classic. My personal impression is that Zegler is like many 22-year-olds. She has a long way to grow. As she matures, I expect more diplomatic answers to interview questions.
I don't think (but maybe I'm wrong) that Zegler's bloviating is what people are concerned with. I don't care that she's unpolished on the red carpet or that she had an attitude on the picket line. I care that her comments gave us a window into the direction this film is taking the story and that it appears that the story will be hackneyed fourth-wave intersectional pap.Zegler was near the beginning of her answer when Gadot intervened with “She’s not gonna be saved by the prince”, so that isn’t my sense of what happened. You can also see Gadot and a man to her left smiling and nodding approvingly as Zegler completes her response, which merely builds on Gadot’s words. I actually think she (Zegler) comes across as quite polished and “on-script” in the Variety interview; it’s the one she did for Extra TV, where she compared the prince to a stalker, that strayed from the Disney-approved talking points.
Oh no, not true love! The horror!And she's not going to be dreaming about true love.
They’re doing a very good job of telling us otherwise, though I actually agree with you! She’s merely the entity they’ve attached their grievances too. If not her, it would have been someone or something else.I don't think (but maybe I'm wrong) that Zegler's bloviating is what people are concerned with.
Her comments reveal an approach that’s entirely consistent with Disney’s handling of princesses since Frozen back in 2013. Can you point to something that you feel is new in this instance?I care that her comments gave us a window into the direction this film is taking the story and that it appears that the story will be hackneyed fourth-wave intersectional pap.
Again, she was beaten to this egregious sentiment by the director of Beauty and the Beast remake: “She really is the first modern Disney princess who doesn’t want to be a princess . . . Someone who's more interested in figuring out who she is than finding a guy and getting married.” And before him by Lily James, star of Cinderella: “This girl isn't waiting for a prince. . . . She is in charge of her own destiny in that her strength and her courage that come from within make her almost a superhero.”Oh no, not true love! The horror!
We can't have true love! We need to Reimagine Snow White for Modern Audiences . Slay queen, she don't need no man.
I don't think (but maybe I'm wrong) that Zegler's bloviating is what people are concerned with. I don't care that she's unpolished on the red carpet or that she had an attitude on the picket line. I care that her comments gave us a window into the direction this film is taking the story and that it appears that the story will be hackneyed fourth-wave intersectional pap.
It's an issue when the audience, customers, yes, the folk's out there, don't want to buy what is being sold.
Exactly.Her comments reveal an approach that’s entirely consistent with Disney’s handling of princesses since Frozen back in 2016.
Does that mean you generally dislike the way Disney has portrayed female characters since Frozen?Exactly.
I would offer two answers to this:
The year-long gap between when she made the remarks and when they they were brought into the news cycle.
The treatment of her remarks as outlandishly and uniquely offensive, when Gadot is right next to her in both interviews saying, “She’s not gonna be saved by the prince.”
What’s wrong with you?!I have a lot of critiques of The Haunted Mansion
Too much seaweed mixed into the krill.What’s wrong with you?!
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.