Chi84
Premium Member
It must be information that hasn’t been shared here. That’s entirely possible.I dont. I do know that the information coming from Disney and its mouthpieces about this product has changed.
It must be information that hasn’t been shared here. That’s entirely possible.I dont. I do know that the information coming from Disney and its mouthpieces about this product has changed.
This is my take. I’m actually extremely happy that Disney seems willing to at listen to their actual core fan base and roll back on at least some of the silly changes for the film. The entire idea of making a Snow White film but changing the fundamental characteristics of the original popular film was just stupid. You want to make a girl boss film with “magical creatures”? Great, go and do that - but don’t make it Snow White, just come up with a new premise.Frankly, I'm applauding whatever group of people are actually listening to what some of the customers are saying and attempting to improve the product before they attempt to sell it.
I don’t think they ever planned not to have dwarfs. But the film is going to be very different from the original. It has to be. There isn’t enough material in the original to support a full length live-action feature film.This is my take. I’m actually extremely happy that Disney seems willing to at listen to their actual core fan base and roll back on at least some of the silly changes for the film. The entire idea of making a Snow White film but changing the fundamental characteristics of the original popular film was just stupid. You want to make a girl boss film with “magical creatures”? Great, go and do that - but don’t make it Snow White, just come up with a new premise.
If you are going to make a money grab live action remake, just stay true to the original. I’m not saying you can’t make some smaller updates, but don’t fundamentally change the film.
This new photo gives me hope that Disney is pivoting back to aiming for what audiences want as opposed to just making a film to advance principles regardless of whether it’s entertaining
I don't think it's for you, or any of us, to decide who constitutes Disney's "actual core fan base". I consider myself a Pixie Duster through and through, and I don't share your views on this matter at all.This is my take. I’m actually extremely happy that Disney seems willing to at listen to their actual core fan base and roll back on at least some of the silly changes for the film.
If Disney had a homogeneous core fan base things would be so much easier for them.I don't think it's for you, or any of us, to decide who constitutes Disney's "actual core fan base". I consider myself a Pixie Duster through and through, and I don't share your views on this matter at all.
I don’t view her comments as disdainful or even that critical. I find Pocahontas quite problematic by today’s standards and could list several things about it I take issue with, but I don’t consider myself critical of the film, which is one I still watch and enjoy.Again you’re free to agree or disagree with her sentiment. But she didn’t merely call it a product of 1937, and her comments were objectively critical of the source material. And your post was a continuation of a thread which started with questioning why someone like Zegler was involved if she was “expressing disdain.”
It wasn’t too much reading. It was basic knowledge and common sense.Nope, I think people just read too much into leaked photos and unconfirmed rumors.
They changed their direction. It doesn’t take much to figure that out.They were either touched twice or are just keeping their original version. Funny how sometimes Disney just does Disney and everyone ties themselves in knots over it.
Ok, so answer me this, where is Grumpy in that leaked photo? What does your common sense tell you about a missing actor who was cast almost a year before that photo was leaked and the character he is cast to play?It wasn’t too much reading. It was basic knowledge and common sense.
And now a delay of a year and release an image with 7 dwarves at the same time. What does common sense tell us?
I don’t think they did. But eventually we’ll find out so there’s no point in arguing about a fact we don’t know.They changed their direction. It doesn’t take much to figure that out.
I think they always intended to have the 7 dwarfs. The delay is easily attributable to the actors’ strike.It wasn’t too much reading. It was basic knowledge and common sense.
And now a delay of a year and release an image with 7 dwarves at the same time. What does common sense tell us?
Unlikely; filming was completed in July 2022.I think they always intended to have the 7 dwarfs. The delay is easily attributable to the actors’ strike.
They need actors to promote the film though.
Because that’s gone so well far.They need actors to promote the film though.
They need media-savvy actors with scripted talking points instead ofThey need actors to promote the film though.
Agreed, as still no one can answer the very simple question of "Where is Grumpy and the actor that is portraying him in that leaked set photo?". If that question can't be answered then one has to admit the very real possibility that the leaked set photo is not the "7 magical creatures" that everyone has such heartburn about.I think they always intended to have the 7 dwarfs.
As you yourself noted, we can't know which characters are represented in the leaked photos. One possible answer to your question is that the little person is a stand-in for Klebba.Agreed, as still no one can answer the very simple question of "Where is Grumpy and the actor that is portraying him in that leaked set photo?". If that question can't be answered then one has to admit the very real possibility that the leaked set photo is not the "7 magical creatures" that everyone has such heartburn about.
You mean the little person with the biggest smile on his face is suppose to be a stand-in for Grumpy? Yeah not likely.As you yourself noted, we can't know which characters are represented in the leaked photos. One possible answer to your question is that the little person is a stand-in for Klebba.
It doesn't look like they're acting in those photos, and some of them are stand-ins anyway. Their facial expressions don't matter.You mean the little person with the biggest smile on his face is suppose to be a stand-in for Grumpy? Yeah not likely.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.