DisneyExplorer
Member
This was talked about at the beginning of the thread.OK. Not to stir the pot, especially since there's probably some drop-off with thread fatigue but has anyone seen http://imagineerebirth.blogspot.com/2008/03/world-of-tears.html?
One thing that this thread is missing is the reference to:
"And in one of the most egregious and downright disgusting decisions in Disney theme park history, the gorgeous New Guinea rainforest scene, replete with some of Mary Blair’s most whimsical character creations (a crocodile with an umbrella, colorful birds hatching from eggs) and her drummer children with Tiki Masks on the opposite shore will be replaced with a Hooray for U.S.A sequence."Has anyone heard anything about this? Whose blog is this anyway? Any credence to any of the postings?
I’m all for this, and I wouldn’t mind seeing it spread over to WDW. The Disney characters they plan on adding (Cinderella and Prince Charming, Peter Pan and friends, and Lilo and Stitch) are already cartoonish looking and will fit well into the attraction. If Disney implements them into the attraction well, meaning they don’t stand out too much (aren’t bigger than all of the other dolls), then it shouldn’t hurt the attraction in anyway, and it will give riders an opportunity to pick out the new “hidden mickeys”. Unlike most attractions that get characters added to them, I think this one will turn out just fine. So, I guess Hong Kong Disneyland came in handy after all. Now onto the point about removing the jungle room. I don’t think we really need America represented in the ride since we live in it. It’s more fun for me to see rooms of countries and cultures that I haven’t been able to experience first-hand. This is a major loss. It’s kind of discriminating to remove an already represented country/culture and replace it with our own.