JEANYLASER
Well-Known Member
Crazy!
I am sure they will be programmed to dispense outrageous rumors and will do it more efficiently then a human driver.
Walt's people mover lives! Slightly different operating system (no tracks) and 40 years late but I think he'd be happy.
It kinda looks like the industry is trying to create some buzz around autonomous shuttles. I've seen a few articles on their use as public transport, most recently at CNET https://www.cnet.com/roadshow/news/self-driving-cars-automated-public-transport-bus/
Haha...so true. Their websites are generally horrible.Disney still seems to have a hard time keeping their own website fully operational on a daily basis, but we should trust that they will have no issues with driver-less shuttles being programmed to roam around the property?
No offense to the bus drivers, but I think the overall experience will be a huge upgrade over the busses for guests. I would much prefer getting on a 10 passenger driverless shuttle that may go slower than the bus but doesn't have to stop for traffic. If they choose to they could add touchscreens to each vehicle that allow people access to tons of info about the parks, resorts or restaurants. It seems like a win for guests to me...I don't see a big downside.Once again shows Disney will do anything to reduce labor cost.
Not realizing a friendly bus driver is an ambassador for Disney
No offense to the bus drivers, but I think the overall experience will be a huge upgrade over the busses for guests. I would much prefer getting on a 10 passenger driverless shuttle that may go slower than the bus but doesn't have to stop for traffic. If they choose to they could add touchscreens to each vehicle that allow people access to tons of info about the parks, resorts or restaurants. It seems like a win for guests to me...I don't see a big downside.
Of course the aim of all of these new transport systems is to improve guest experience while also cutting labor costs. How is that a bad thing? I guess if you are a bus driver it is, but for guests you get a more enjoyable experience and it's possible because TWDC is saving money on labor costs. That long term savings from labor costs is being invested in new and better technology.
Not true in this case. I don't think there's a large net sum gain for TWDC here. They are spending money on the new technology, new vehicles, dedicated lanes, etc. That is offset by a decrease in labor costs for bus drivers. In the long run the new spend is probably mostly offset by the cost savings but the guests all get a better experience (or at least we hope it's better). One of the areas that consistently gets less than stellar marks from guest surveys is bus transportation. If they can address the problem and it also cuts some costs how is that a bad thing?If the 'savings' were actually invested in a better park experience that would be one thing we could all support but in reality they are being used to offset revenue declines in other business units.
Not true in this case. I don't think there's a large net sum gain for TWDC here. They are spending money on the new technology, new vehicles, dedicated lanes, etc. That is offset by a decrease in labor costs for bus drivers. In the long run the new spend is probably mostly offset by the cost savings but the guests all get a better experience (or at least we hope it's better). One of the areas that consistently gets less than stellar marks from guest surveys is bus transportation. If they can address the problem and it also cuts some costs how is that a bad thing?
I think you are correct in the order of rollout. CMs first to work out the kinks, then parking trams which can have dedicated pathways easily laid out and the final phase would be resorts to parks over short distances. I think AKL to AK would be a perfect place to start. I don't see this as being as efficient for longer distances or routes that would require crossing highways. I still think maybe a light rail type system would be a good solution for a cross property route like AK to EPCOT to DS.Wouldn't this be a good fit for Future World at Epcot? Maybe we need to look at this not as transportation for the property, but as transportation for #1 Cast members to get from Cast Services building to their areas, #2 Use as a replacement for Trams(?), #3 Use as transportation from resorts closest to the park(s). I think it they would ever put in another mode of transportation it will include those that do not have monorail access! I could see this being used at Disney Springs to go back and forth from Cirque to Marketplace I could see it being used at Animal Kingdom and Lodge for guests. Wonder if this would be less expensive than running busses? Might be better footprint overall! I guess time will tell! Either way, its exciting to see he news!
I think you are correct in the order of rollout. CMs first to work out the kinks, then parking trams which can have dedicated pathways easily laid out and the final phase would be resorts to parks over short distances. I think AKL to AK would be a perfect place to start. I don't see this as being as efficient for longer distances or routes that would require crossing highways. I still think maybe a light rail type system would be a good solution for a cross property route like AK to EPCOT to DS.
Hate to be the fly in the ointment, but how is it possible that they can bring something like this online in such a short time (if true), when the project automating the monorails has been ongoing for 2-3 years?
I know, I know, different project, tecnology, company, etc, etc.
Not saying I don't want it to happen and not trying to derail the conversation, I'm just a bit skeptical.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.