PiratesMansion
Well-Known Member
Well, really lateral means that a given change is neither definitively more positive or more negative, but I know you (and many others) feel more strongly negative against a number of changes than I do.If a change to a beloved attraction is 'lateral', that means it's a step back.
That the new Fantasmic, with 20 years of new technology and progress in show design could be considered a 'lateral' move and not a bona fide improvement really demonstrates how far Disney Creative has fallen.
But to the larger point- if Disney is going to say an existing scene or attraction is negative and problematic, they need to make dang sure what they're replacing it with is the best they've done. The new Auction scene doesn't do that. Pixar Pier didn't do that. Time will tell if the Jungle Cruise changes did that- but so far it looks like they recycled the 'chimps overran the camp' gag already present in the attraction, just this time with a boat.
Are they on a downward trend? Definitely. Are the changes perfect? No. Is literally every cloud in the DLR sky falling the way that many have been implying for at the very least the last year? Is every change that has happened or that is coming clearly and definitively negative from every and all angles? I'd say no on both counts.
Maybe the new Jungle Cruise is a disaster. Maybe it's a success. I don't know. I won't know until I experience it in person because I'm not interested in forming judgments before I see it in person. It probably won't be perfect but if we're being honest, Jungle Cruise 2019 wasn't exactly a flawless masterpiece either. If Jungle Cruise ever was a flawless masterpiece, it wasn't ever when I was there to see it. So I imagine for me that this specific change will be a lateral move. Not better, not worse, just different.
Unless the changes and the script really are that bad. Dialogue certainly is not modern Disney's strong suit by any measure. But as I said, I'll reserve judgment until my first ride.