Californian Elitist
Well-Known Member
There’s nothing necessarily wrong with the presence of animals. It’s the possible fact that there are more animals than there are dolls. African countries are rife with various cultures. There’s really no excuse to showcase Africa with mostly animals. There’s more to the countries and the continent in general than lions and elephants. I believe that it would make a difference.In the case of IASW, don’t you think it has something to do with Africa having all the cool animals? What animal would they use for Italy for example? I can’t even think of one animal that is really associated with the country off the top of my head. On a ride, you are going for the most bang for your buck as the boats glide by the given scene. For Italy, they chose a gondola because people see that instantly understand. For Africa they chose a few African natives and all the really cool animals because it instantly paints a picture. By the way, the Africa scene is by far my favorite scene in IASW. It has the most character with all the colorful animals and all of the greenery hanging from the ceiling gives it much more depth than ceiling tiles found elsewhere. Someone looking at the glass half full could say they cared the most about the Africa scene. Would a few more natives with perhaps more accurate clothing in addition to the animals really make a difference?
It’s my ongoing joke but if we want to be really accurate we could just put all the dolls in business casual clothing and have them sitting in cubicles. Of course the ride has to be based on stereotypes because it’s in those stereotypes that you find the most color, character and diversity.
I’m not even sure if there are more animals than doll children. Might have to look at a ride-through.