TP2000
Well-Known Member
Think of it like the treehouse or TSI. It’s a walkthrough interactive experience anyone can enjoy with water features and edutainment
Okay, that helps. At least a little.
Think of it like the treehouse or TSI. It’s a walkthrough interactive experience anyone can enjoy with water features and edutainment
Should they not have built required pumps and treatment facilities?It would be interesting to know how much it cost to make this attraction.
TWDC would never disclose its true cost.
We all watched over the years how much work went into it.
It was probably a lot of money with the water treatment plant and all.
They should have not built this (attraction?).Should they not have built required pumps and treatment facilities?
Elaborate rock work.It would be interesting to know how much it cost to make this attraction.
TWDC would never disclose its true cost.
We all watched over the years how much work went into it.
It was probably a lot of money with the water treatment plant and all.
We are blinded to the value of this attraction by our privilege. Some people live in places where the water doesn't journey at all: it just sits there not journeying. Others live in places where the Water Cycle can't even be discussed in schools because of oppressive and hydrophobic "Don't Say Spray" laws.I'm struggling to understand why this is even a thing at Epcot now.
Like, this is it? You walk through a little path and watch water trickle and flow over fake rocks and then for the grand finale' they splash water on some rocks behind a fence for you? And you get some smarmy messaging about "Protecting The Water" or something?
I just don't get this. Why? And why did it take so long? What's the point? Who would pay money to do this? I'm baffled.
Agreed, like the (attraction?) it's not worth the effort.some of yall are getting way too upset about a walkthrough lifecycle of water attraction lol.
Like an elaborate queue in search of an attraction...lol
Well too late to change the course now...But what a disaster all of the EPCOT project is... Guardians is at least well done and a lot of fun... and the front entrance with it's restored fountain and courtyard are nice.
The rest, what we have seen completed, is ok. Cutting a Mary Poppins attraction was bad... along with not adding anything else to World Showcase...
It was a joke!Just a guess on my part, but the folks who can afford a WDW vacation are some of the most privileged people around with access to the best water in the world.
You got me. Your post was right on!It was a joke!
I thought the winky emoji would be enough to get that across.
I was wrong.
I kind of agree as well. It would have been like a teacups spinner (which the park could use) but I would really like to see a bigger budget something with MPIn my opinion, cutting Mary Poppins as what they intended to build was a good thing. It would have been an elaborate queue with a carousel and would have cost way more than it should have.
I do agree that much of this project has been a mess when comparing the amount of work and time spent to what actually ends up being opened.
Their attempt at turning the nearly 60 year old movie into a franchise fizzled.I kind of agree as well. It would have been like a teacups spinner (which the park could use) but I would really like to see a bigger budget something with MP
Like an elaborate queue in search of an attraction...lol
They didn't do themselves any favors with the WDW version of the Little Mermaid queue there, either.lol.. perfect analysis. It literally just seems like an elaborate queue.
some of yall are getting way too upset about a walkthrough lifecycle of water attraction lol.
Yeah, but think of what the folks of Arrakis would think of such an attraction!!It was a joke!
I thought the winky emoji, absurd tone, and Onion-esque hyperbole would be enough to get that across to the typical reader.
I was wrong.
You got me. Your post was right on!
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.