Lee
Adventurer
abian said:Since you work so many "projects" in many parks your actaully age might old enough to die but still....such childsish mind. I pitty YOU. you poor ______________.
That is serioiusly uncalled for.
I vote for a ban.
abian said:Since you work so many "projects" in many parks your actaully age might old enough to die but still....such childsish mind. I pitty YOU. you poor ______________.
Corrus said:He's not hired for the glory of WDW, or for the visitors... It's about MONEY... which has nothing to do with fun... It all has to do with profits and shareholders... and nothing to do with WDW...
Corrus said:Never mind her Lee... she's in my Ignore list now...
I agree!Scar Junior said:Haha. Seriously Corrus... why does everyone go after you? It's ridiculous.
TP2000 said:How could anyone forget about WDW? They won't do that. Neither will they forget about the three other properties they have around the world, with a fourth on the way for Shanghai.
Nope...DisneyRoxMySox said:Is that official?
EpcoTim said:And if filling the parks with Pixar movies is whats going to happen......then we may all indeed be doomed. Maybe. Pixar is where the money is right now, it has strong brand recoginition and some winners under its belt. I for one would hate to see the parks flooded with Pixar. Unless......the rides are above and beyond anything we have seen. Keep them out of Epcot (I know, I know).
KevinPage said:Tim,
I don't want to single you out since alot of people feel the way you do, but I still don't get the "we don't want Pixar attractions" mantra people obsess over.
Even though "Disney employees" didn't create all those great/classic Pixar films, hasn't most of their staff worked for or at the very least been completely inspired by Walt Disney and the way the WDC used to operate? To me Pixar movies are "more Disney than Disney itself". And the fact that they were put out by Disney, WDC has some limited input into the films itself.
I'd rather see attractions based off incredibley successful and popular films such as: Monsters Inc., The Incredibles, or Finding Nemo
As opposed to: Chicken Little, Home on the Range, or Atlantis
The simple fact is if Disney has created as many iconic and classic flims as Pixar has in the past 10 years, everyone would be "on board" for attractions based on them.
Disney has nothing to do with Indiana Jones or Star Wars, yet I don't hear any complaints about those attractions.
Pixar IS Disney way before they were purchased by TWDC, so I'm on board for whatever they want to implement with their films.
We can thank Mr. Eisner for the theater in the Tree of Life, it was his suggestion to put an attraction in there.DisneyRoxMySox said:I think that, It's Tough To Be a Bug, is not only a cute and entertaining attraction but it is a great use of space.
STR8FAN2005 said:We can thank Mr. Eisner for the theater in the Tree of Life, it was his suggestion to put an attraction in there.
Oh, a theater of course!STR8FAN2005 said:What else could the ToL possibly be used for?
A simulator?
A dark ride?
Not much, a theater works perfectly IMO. Plus, the film can be changed, updated, etc and so can the effects. The ToL hardly has the space inside it that SSE has.
Okay, well ITtbaB won't last forever...it's already almost 10.CoffeeJedi said:Oh, a theater of course!
In another post (this thread? not sure) i said that i would have like to see Soarin' Over the World go into the ToL. But failing that (as the mechanism might not fit, another 3D movie would be great, but it should be scenes of the beauty and majesty of nature, showing its breadth and diversity. Perhaps with a slight (but not preachy) conservation or ecology theme. Something to really get guests in the mindset of Disney's Animal Kingdom.
Gack!STR8FAN2005 said:I hear that they are working on a Finding Nemo 3D movie for the ToL theater....:lookaroun
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.