jt04
Well-Known Member
It is official with disney administration but no word to the public.
We know people that have seen the plans.
And no they wont let me see them.
Legal reasons.
Drats!
It is official with disney administration but no word to the public.
We know people that have seen the plans.
And no they wont let me see them.
Legal reasons.
Unfortuantly the SSE, Pirates, and el rio refurbishments were nothing to write home about and in the case of SSE and El rio were quite poor.
IASW got a good refurb (Thank God we didn't get cartoon cash-ins stuffed into the ride) but there were some things in the ride where they got lazy (such as not closing up the ceiling in some of the rooms). I was impressed with the Haunted Mansion and Big Thunder refurbs especially since they unfortuantly had such little time to work with. So they give me some hope.
I just wish all imagineering projects had to get run by the top guys like Joe Rhode, John Lasseter, and Tony Baxter before getting greenlit. Similar to how all the animated movies have to get run by the brain trust of top animators and directors. Just so that we don't wind up with trivial and unnecessary cartoon tie-ins and lame "interactive" elements that do very little to spice up the ride. The budget for those things could be put to better use implementing better special effects and more sophisticated AA's and richer themeing.
I have heard alot of talk and rumors about updating WDW SM, is that actually official yet? if so when is it happening?
Tony Baxter and Marty Sklar were the minds behind the stylized versions of the Disney characters for "it's a small world". Not much was changed in the Big Thunder rehab, stuff was just fixed. Haunted Mansion was a good improvement because it took away from weak areas of the ride. The other complaints about SSE, Pirates and El Rio I feel are largely opinion based, when of course you're entitled to.
Wouldn't need to really "sign off", but he was certainly aware.And Lasseter would have signed off on it too, right?
That's what we've been saying for a few pages now.:lol:Space Mountain said:Let's just say...
Wouldn't need to really "sign off", but he was certainly aware.
Would those be the ceiling panels that you have to look back over your shoulder, up, and to the left on the ride?IASW got a good refurb (Thank God we didn't get cartoon cash-ins stuffed into the ride) but there were some things in the ride where they got lazy (such as not closing up the ceiling in some of the rooms).
Probably. Maybe not through any sort of veto power, but just through some polite pressure.Could he have blocked it if he wanted, as Chief whatever he is? I'm just curious.
I know where you are talking about and you have to be highly observant to see them, especially in the opening scene. Like I said, your talking about looking away from show elements, back over your shoulder, and up. Either highly observant, nitpicky, or incredibly bored (on IASW...never! :snoreI don't know if the ceiling tiles have been replaced, but there were still noticeable gaps in the ceiling back in January 2007 where you could see the warehouse ceiling. I had forgotten about it myself as I was too busy looking at all the refurbed sets and AA's, but a couple in the row infront of us saw it and pointed up at it, and there it was in the opening scene and british scene, large holes of missing ceiling tiles. :shrug:
Would those be the ceiling panels that you have to look back over your shoulder, up, and to the left on the ride?
Well thought out and I hope it ends up similar to your description. The theme is critical but I hope they go for the retro style. Just glad it finally is getting done. If the queue is only half as good as Tokyo I will be ecstatic.As we have talked about before, SM needs the wow factor or the fear factor in it again. While I enjoy space mountain for various reasons, I remember when I first went on it in 1996 after hearing my grandparents rant and rave about it and how dark it was, they said it used to be pitch black which isn't true. I was told by a CM on the keys to the kingdom tour that the ride was in fact darker, but since some of the light bulbs used to make effects on the ceiling aren't made anymore, there has been more visible light leaks due to incorrect lighting, let alone the wide open queue doesn't help too much either.
Space Mountain needs better branding, and maybe more of a storyline to go along with a possible new rollercoaster track and effects.
There is such a mess of clutter out front (what is it with disney and clutter?)
My only personal attatchments are the hexagon windows and groovy queue music. They are something unique to wdw's space mountain. In california all you do is look at static pictures. If those unique effects can some how be incorporated into an all new retro or space age queue with awesome sound and lighting and effects and the rollercoaster itself in a more darker and thrilling evironment, then not only do you still have a ride that has some homages to the past i.e. upside down astronauts working on RCA explorer ship, hexagon windows and queue music, you have the newest thrilling ride in outer space! :sohappy:
It`s not a case of blocking out the view; it`s more protecting the TTA - and guests - from the potential of hundereds of tonnes of steel coming down way too fast. In theory theWEDway cars could be diverted via the storage garage in SMs north side, but with the lights out in there it`d be even more boring than SSEs finaleEspecially considering the length of the potential SM refurb, will the TTA be down for the entire length of the work as well? It seems that they could block out the view of the inside of the building if they wanted to, but I suppose a lot would depend on the scope of the work. Any idea?
You've lost me. You are either 1) Not responding to my point that a serious thrill ride is a different animal from a family immersive ride and continuing with your sarcastic rant or 2) Seriously advocating the destruction of classic Disney rides.
I'm assuming it's option #1.
Why bring in the whole thing about movies? They aren't refurbing SM to make it more like a movie. (Hopefully) they are refurbing it to make it more true to its original role in the park - to provide serious thrills and excitement. Surely you have to agree the current SM does not accomplish this goal.
It ALMOST reminds me of another debate I had on these boards with someone who said World of Motion should never have been turned into Test Track. To me this is ridiculous as Test Track is a far superior ride. In that case the decision was made that Epcot needed more thrills, so World of Motion was turned into a thrill ride.
What's different in this case is that SM is ALREADY a thrill ride. (At least it's supposed to be!) So I can't understand why anyone would object to making the ride more "thrilling" as this is consistent with what the ride is supposed to be.
PS. I leave for WDW in 18 days!
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.