• Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.You can use your Twitter or Facebook account to sign up, or register directly.

Rumor Is Indiana Jones Planning an Adventure to Disney's Animal Kingdom?

PorterRedkey

Premium Member
Advertisement
So, if AK gets Indy and the Shanghai boat tech is between Epcot and DHS, what does the losing park get. Say Epcot gets the Shanghai tech then what does DHS get?
Are the WDW parks still fighting to get some Avatar FoP type ride? Would the "loser" between Epcot and DHS get a FoP-like attraction or will it be some other type of attraction?
 

Jones14

Well-Known Member
So, if AK gets Indy and the Shanghai boat tech is between Epcot and DHS, what does the losing park get. Say Epcot gets the Shanghai tech then what does DHS get?
Are the WDW parks still fighting to get some Avatar FoP type ride? Would the "loser" between Epcot and DHS get a FoP-like attraction or will it be some other type of attraction?
I don’t think the other parks would benefit from a FoP. Magic Kingdom could only really use it in Adventureland or Tomorrowland, which would feel redundant. EPCOT already has Soarin’ (which still works now, but would immediately show its age if it sat next to FoP), and DHS doesn’t need another simulator.

I think the park that loses the boat ride gets nothing, unless it goes to EPCOT and DHS manages to get Indy back.
 

brb1006

Well-Known Member
Pirates is good! The ride system is incredible. Sections of it are outstanding. Sections of it are mediocre. The ride favors row one in the screen sections. The cgi is poor. I’m disappointed in the cgi so much actually. It looks like something sea world would have done. This is Disney, you own ILM or whomever does that stuff. It should have been better imo. I think the reaction to pirates is mostly right. We’ve just never seen a boat do what it can do in water, which is really really neat to be apart of.
The only LPS ride you should check out is Hunny Hunt at Tokyo.
 

marni1971

WDW History nut
Premium Member
So, if AK gets Indy and the Shanghai boat tech is between Epcot and DHS, what does the losing park get. Say Epcot gets the Shanghai tech then what does DHS get?
Are the WDW parks still fighting to get some Avatar FoP type ride? Would the "loser" between Epcot and DHS get a FoP-like attraction or will it be some other type of attraction?
The "looser" would possibly get nothing.

It’s down to an amazing ride system that has the chance of coming to Orlando. Naturally several different groups of people think it’d be a perfect fit for "their" proposal.
 

Magicart87

Premium Member
Didn't stop Pandora. Besides, dinosaurs were George's first idea for Temple of Doom. Might as well bring that to life if this dumb IP mandate is this strong.
Good thing George's first idea didn't pan out. And as someone else on here more clearly stated; paleontology isn't archaeology. Perhaps George eventually realized this. Now it's TDO's turn.
 

Kman101

Well-Known Member
An Indy boat ride in DHS makes sense on so many levels. So of course they decided to put Indy in one of the two parks he doesn't belong, and as a replacement for a perfectly good ride rather than a new build. Of course.
I know. I'm right there with you. It's so mind boggling how they get it wrong. Like, how hard is it?
 

Kman101

Well-Known Member
The "looser" would possibly get nothing.

It’s down to an amazing ride system that has the chance of coming to Orlando. Naturally several different groups of people think it’d be a perfect fit for "their" proposal.
So very blue sky at this point?

I'm going to guess the Indy into Dino is true because of the way you and MB are talking.

Who makes these decisions because they're making the wrong ones.
 

Kman101

Well-Known Member
Definitely true. I just wonder what country would require or be suited to such a massive E-ticket attraction like that.
It's just bizarre to me they aren't considering a boat ride for DHS. Featuring Indy. Boom. Done. Why is it so hard?? I don't get it. I really really don't. LOL.

Jungle Book gets the boat ride? Moana? Has to be IP related.
 

Fox&Hound

Well-Known Member
If this happens, I think it means that the Indy show is not long for DHS. Think about it. If the Indy show was staying, then a new Indy ride next to it makes the most sense. If they are getting rid of the show but still want Indy to have a presence, then converting Dinosaur saves them money.

I am not sure Indy fits AK but if they bring a South American land (like another poster said) could make sense with Indy as a part of it. Then DHS gets a brand new land and AK gets a much needed improvement over Dinoland. They will probably bring the Indy ride from Paris to replace the dino spin coaster (forgot its name). Although I heard that ride is very off the shelf and and uninspired.

I like Dinosaur but if it means getting rid of the garish Chester and Hesters, I say bring on the Indy! :)
 

atighe42

Well-Known Member
It's just bizarre to me they aren't considering a boat ride for DHS. Featuring Indy. Boom. Done. Why is it so hard?? I don't get it. I really really don't. LOL.

Jungle Book gets the boat ride? Moana? Has to be IP related.
Truly baffling. A brand new, surefire hit of an experience.....and they may go with a 20+ year old attraction idea. Ridiculousness.
Though Jungle Book would be really cool....but I’m team Indy (at DHS)
 

Kman101

Well-Known Member
Truly baffling. A brand new, surefire hit of an experience.....and they may go with a 20+ year old attraction idea. Ridiculousness.
Though Jungle Book would be really cool....but I’m team Indy (at DHS)
Personally they could re-theme Kali to Jungle Book and I'd not be too upset. In fact it'd be an improvement. But I guess the whole soaking you thing puts a bit of a damper on that. I do think the boat ride tech could work for a few IPs. Jungle Book would be really cool. But I had my heart set on an Indy boat ride (and I probably shouldn't have clung to the idea but it just made SO much sense to me -- and clearly many of us are baffled why it didn't make sense to them)
 

Kman101

Well-Known Member
If this happens, I think it means that the Indy show is not long for DHS. Think about it. If the Indy show was staying, then a new Indy ride next to it makes the most sense. If they are getting rid of the show but still want Indy to have a presence, then converting Dinosaur saves them money.

I am not sure Indy fits AK but if they bring a South American land (like another poster said) could make sense with Indy as a part of it. Then DHS gets a brand new land and AK gets a much needed improvement over Dinoland. They will probably bring the Indy ride from Paris to replace the dino spin coaster (forgot its name). Although I heard that ride is very off the shelf and and uninspired.

I like Dinosaur but if it means getting rid of the garish Chester and Hesters, I say bring on the Indy! :)
I appreciate how you are looking on the positive of things! I'm not there yet ;) lol

Chester and Hester's DinoRama could be solved. Since they're on a coasters kick, add Excavator and call it a day. Completely re-do and refresh Dinosaur (but instead I guess they're just switching it with Indy now, they're looking at it from a $$ perspective not a "what's best for these parks" perspective). Boom. Refreshed Dinoland USA!

I wish they'd stop taking IPs I like and putting them where I don't think they should go. LOL.

I'd be all for South America and Indy in AK if it were the boat ride and not replacing Dinoland. Go figure that one out. But I still think Indy's place should be DHS.

So what's their plan with DHS? Keep the stunt show another three decades? They should have put Star Wars there instead. Man they really make some poor decisions.
 

IMDREW

Well-Known Member
Can’t the shanghai pirates boat tech be used for two different rides in two different parks? Disney does it all the time. Even the same system multiple times in the same park! And I’m all for a South America with an Indy ride, but something tells me they’d want a real Indy land and not just a ride..
 

FigmentJedi

Well-Known Member
Good thing George's first idea didn't pan out. And as someone else on here more clearly stated; paleontology isn't archaeology. Perhaps George eventually realized this. Now it's TDO's turn.
Even though he's an archaeologist, Indiana Jones is primarily based on paleontologist Roy Chapman Andrews, who did a lot of work in Mongolia, which inspired an Indiana Jones book where he meets a living Triceratops in that neck of the woods.
Also, the whole "Lost World full of dinosaurs and extinct beasts" was a staple of the pulp adventure stories that Indiana Jones belongs to as a genre.
 
Top Bottom