So what should this have been?
No, the lesson that should be learned is Don't Mess with Disneyland. Batuu is not Disneyland.
Disney designed and built a land that intentionally ignored what makes Disneyland great, and the crowds didn't come. Basic design and storytelling principles were ignored. Actual substance was ignored for fluff lingo and design to give the impression of depth.
Not to mention the myriad of changes made to Disneyland's pricing structure in anticipation for Galaxy's Edge since 2015. And the Stardust alterations present throughout the rest of the park, harming Disneyland's beauty to anticipate crowds that haven't shown up.
Instead of building a real D ticket attraction with depth and intriguing design, we got a half hearted video game that both seeks to distance itself from the original trilogy, but also rely on that nostalgia for it's appeal.
Instead of designing a land that's intended to integrate and improve Disneyland's mythology, we got a land that ignores the rest of the park in an attempt to create more 'immersive' storytelling.
The rest of the park are lands intended to reside within Disneyland, USA. It's why you see it written on the Twain for example. Galaxy's Edge is intended to reside on Batuu. This is confusing and disjointing. It also causes guests to hold the land to a different standard- many idiosyncrasies present throughout Disneyland are ignored because, well, Disneyland! It's the identity of the park, and it's why the park is beloved. Galaxy's Edge won't get this same luxury, and because of this- the land will be far less charming than what's been built before.
I'm speaking for myself only here, but I'd take 2014 Disneyland with Fantasmic, the longer river, and planters+curbs any day over the 2019 iteration of the park.
THIS^^^^^^Instead of building a real D ticket attraction with depth and intriguing design, we got a half hearted video game that both seeks to distance itself from the original trilogy, but also rely on that nostalgia for it's appeal.
How can they survey someone who is not in their park?But the survey needs to be from NON-guests, asking them why they are not visiting Disneyland as a destination this summer.
Yes, pricing and scared of extra large crowds will be two main responses. Also a large percentage who just don't like Theme/Amusement parks in general.
But if a question was, would having Han Solo, Luke Skywalker, Princess Lela, C3P0 and R2D2 doing character visits, entertainment, featured on attractions, etc. help influence you to visiting the park, I think you would have many positive responses.
I believe we are about to enter another period similar to the early 2000s where Disney is going to only invest in cheap rides. I really enjoy Galaxy's Edge as a theme park fan, but I think the era of the Mega Lands is going to come to an abrupt end and all those proposed lands for Tokyo and Paris are about to be slashed.
I further wonder if the rammifications are farther reaching and if Universal is still going to pursue Super Nintendo World.
Only the OT cast were at the lands dedication tooThis.
The message is "Star Wars: Galaxy's Edge". The marketing is "Fly the Millennium Falcon" with it looking like it's straight out of the OT (radar dish notwithstanding).
Batuu? What's Batuu? I see ads for a cantina, I see kids hugging Chewie.
They ESSENTIALLY ARE marketing it as a OT land. And if RotR was open, you can bet they'd show that AT-AT money shot over and over.
Now, Walt Disney Studios Paris? If Galaxy's Edge fails to launch correctly at DHS in the Fall as well, I could see ramifications there. But this needs to be a much longer trend, the ripples are mostly going to be limited to TDA and cause the TDO planners to go into marketing overdrive (and not attempt to suppress their crowds whatsoever).
Zelda (Indy style dark ride) and Animal Crossing (town with walk-around characters and a comical dark ride) should definitely be next. And if they can talk the Pokemon Co. into going along, a Pokemon area would be insanely great. Other properties like Kirby, Star Fox, Metroid, Fire Emblem, Pikmin, etc. could all appear in various forms in a "Smash" Plaza area. I, personally, would also build a Rhythm Heaven Cafe.IMHO, considering Super Nintendo World as a single IP land is incorrect. The strength of SNW is that, even if it is primarly based on Mario and friends in Phase 1, Universal will be able to add any other franchises that is under the Nintendo brand (Zelda, Splatoon, Kirby, Animal Crossing...) in the future to diversify the offering and appeal to everyone. The only difference with "classic" lands like Fantasyland is that it will feature immersive environments.
How can they survey someone who is not in their park?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.