Is attendance really down at WDW this or…

Minnesota disney fan

Well-Known Member
Marvel can’t really be used in Orlando, the most popular franchises with staying power (Spidy, X-men, F4) are in Universal. Frontierland is getting a princess ride. Mario is a far bigger draw, I don’t know why people keep on discounting him, and just wait until Pokémon Land comes.
The kids that we saw this Halloween were mostly Mario, and witches were second, lol. I was surprised at all the Mario's so I think that park will be a big smash for boys, and everyone who enjoys Mario.
 

networkpro

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
Yes
Sir Mickey's? Isn't that a gift shop?

Are Tomorrowland, Adventureland and Frontierland not enough for boys?

As for new IP, are Marvel and SW not enough?

Yes Sir Mickey is indeed a gift shop, but since 2019 its merchandise is all princess attire, well there are a few foam swords and shields.
 

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member
Sir Mickey's? Isn't that a gift shop?

Are Tomorrowland, Adventureland and Frontierland not enough for boys?

As for new IP, are Marvel and SW not enough?

While we as Disney fans know MK offers much more than Princesses, the public perception that MK is the "princess park" can't be overstated.

They need to do a better job advertising what the park actually offers, even if that goes against their IP/character focus.
 

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member
It seems like Disney has had a hard time coming up with new IP that really resonates with boys, for whatever reason. Mickey is still a hit, and Spidey, but when it comes to original content from the past decade or so.

They tried really hard to make Pirates the boys equivalent to Princesses in the mid-to-late 2000s, but after they bought Marvel and Star Wars, they gave up trying to make any in-house boy-centric toy lines.

Too bad the "Disney Heroes" products with Peter Pan, Hercules, Aladdin etc didn't work for them.
 

DisneyHead123

Well-Known Member
Sir Mickey's? Isn't that a gift shop?

Are Tomorrowland, Adventureland and Frontierland not enough for boys?

As for new IP, are Marvel and SW not enough?
A gift shop that is largely a dress emporium, to my mind. They throw some scraps to the boys but nowhere near the scale.

Regarding Tomorrowland, Adventureland, and Frontierland - I enjoy them, of course, but I don't see boys losing their minds over the prospect of visiting them, the way that little girls lose their minds when told they're going to BBB and CRT afterwards.

Marvel is a strong IP with boys, although I'm not clear on the ride restrictions they have in Orlando. I think only Universal can use the most popular characters like Spider? SW I don't hear a lot of kids talking about. It's all Mario, Spidey, Roblox. Paw Patrol, trucks / trains / cars with the littles - Bluey probably does have a bit of traction with that crowd, but I doubt Bluey will end up in the parks.
 

DisneyHead123

Well-Known Member
They tried really hard to make Pirates the boys equivalent to Princesses in the mid-to-late 2000s, but after they bought Marvel and Star Wars, they gave up trying to make any in-house boy-centric toy lines.

Too bad the "Disney Heroes" products with Peter Pan, Hercules, Aladdin etc didn't work for them.

Yeah, it just seems like nothing they threw out there stuck. I recall reading somewhere that they tried forever to get a video game line going as well, and that just never took off either (they do offer games but I believe at this point they license rights to other companies).
 

erasure fan1

Well-Known Member
Yeah, it just seems like nothing they threw out there stuck. I recall reading somewhere that they tried forever to get a video game line going as well, and that just never took off either (they do offer games but I believe at this point they license rights to other companies).
It's not that Disney interactive never took off. It was the games in general were not very good. Iger has never been a fan of the video game space, so he never knew how to handle it. Lucasarts was a successful developer for many, many years. One of the first things Iger did when Lucasfilm was purchased, was kill Lucasarts. Most of what Disney put out in the video game space, was generic movie/tv tie in shovelware. It's unfortunate because they have such a rich ip catalog that most developers would kill for.
 

drizgirl

Well-Known Member
A gift shop that is largely a dress emporium, to my mind. They throw some scraps to the boys but nowhere near the scale.

Regarding Tomorrowland, Adventureland, and Frontierland - I enjoy them, of course, but I don't see boys losing their minds over the prospect of visiting them, the way that little girls lose their minds when told they're going to BBB and CRT afterwards.

Marvel is a strong IP with boys, although I'm not clear on the ride restrictions they have in Orlando. I think only Universal can use the most popular characters like Spider? SW I don't hear a lot of kids talking about. It's all Mario, Spidey, Roblox. Paw Patrol, trucks / trains / cars with the littles - Bluey probably does have a bit of traction with that crowd, but I doubt Bluey will end up in the parks.
That’s moving the goalpost. You made the point that Disney didn't offer as much for boys. When in reality they offer a lot.

Maybe you should consider a trip to CA to see Carsland and Marvel Campus.
 
Last edited:

JoeCamel

Well-Known Member
But it won’t happen for awhile, EU has expansion pads, and with Universal shifting many backstage offices and departments off the main campus Studios and or IOA will be able to expand towards each other (potentially taking over some soundstages)
Took 10 years for the IOA expansion so to me that or 15 sounds like a reasonable time frame. They can pour money into Orlando for the next 15 years if the demand is there
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
Took 10 years for the IOA expansion so to me that or 15 sounds like a reasonable time frame. They can pour money into Orlando for the next 15 years if the demand is there

Comcast is much more aggressive
/proactive and the land needs much less renovation than IOA's did plus the bigger picture
Universal's resources are richer.
It will be interesting to see for sure. It will likely depend on what pop culture will bring in the next five years as well.

It will be very interesting to see what plans are in store to keep LA alive and how Texas and Vegas work out regionally speaking.


At the end of the day, people who think that Epic Universe is just a third theme park are not realizing the scope of this project.
 
Last edited:

Touchdown

Well-Known Member
Took 10 years for the IOA expansion so to me that or 15 sounds like a reasonable time frame. They can pour money into Orlando for the next 15 years if the demand is there
I imagine that the next big expansions will be bringing the other two big Nintendo properties to Orlando, next up will be Hyrule aka Legend of Zelda land to the lost continent, and when rights expire in 2028 (I believe) turning Springfield and potentially MIB to Kanto/Pokemon Land. Both locations I imagine will have shows (a stunt show back in Sinbad, and a Pokemon Tournament special effect show) shops and a signature ride.
 

DisneyHead123

Well-Known Member
It's not that Disney interactive never took off. It was the games in general were not very good. Iger has never been a fan of the video game space, so he never knew how to handle it. Lucasarts was a successful developer for many, many years. One of the first things Iger did when Lucasfilm was purchased, was kill Lucasarts. Most of what Disney put out in the video game space, was generic movie/tv tie in shovelware. It's unfortunate because they have such a rich ip catalog that most developers would kill for.
Interesting, I didn’t know the backstory. I feel like they’ll need to get back into games / apps at some point if they want to stay relevant in the entertainment portion of the business (unless just licensing out their IP makes more sense logistically.)
 

drizgirl

Well-Known Member
It's not that Disney interactive never took off. It was the games in general were not very good. Iger has never been a fan of the video game space, so he never knew how to handle it. Lucasarts was a successful developer for many, many years. One of the first things Iger did when Lucasfilm was purchased, was kill Lucasarts. Most of what Disney put out in the video game space, was generic movie/tv tie in shovelware. It's unfortunate because they have such a rich ip catalog that most developers would kill for.
Disney isn't very good at running their own website. Why would anyone think they would be good at video games?
 

erasure fan1

Well-Known Member
Interesting, I didn’t know the backstory. I feel like they’ll need to get back into games / apps at some point if they want to stay relevant in the entertainment portion of the business (unless just licensing out their IP makes more sense logistically.)
I think both makes sense. Different developers have different strengths. The smartest thing Lucasarts did was let bioware make knights of the old republic. Also Disney allowing square enix to make kingdom hearts was also a great move. Video games are the largest entertainment sector by far, so Disney would be smart to take is seriously and figure it out. Unfortunately I don't see that happening under the current Iger administration.
 

erasure fan1

Well-Known Member
Disney isn't very good at running their own website. Why would anyone think they would be good at video games?
That's very true. The point is more they could and should. At this point, their only really good option is to buy their way back in. They'd need to purchase a couple studios, and hire an industry veteran to run things, then let them work. Unfortunately, like a lot of what has happened under Iger quality would not be the priority, micro transactions would. We already saw it with how they handled the star wars video game license.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom