BoarderPhreak
Well-Known Member
I couldn't honestly care less about IP. Sure, it's good for marketing. As long as an attraction is cool in that Disney way, I'm game. Oh, is there a movie about it? Meh.
Kiss "Epcot" as a concept good-bye.
Some surprising honesty. Iger marvels at people at the parks because he clearly doesn’t understand why they are so into something he sees as so stupid.
Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men, and all that, but it seems to me that it's a good thing that expansion is happening in the parks, regardless of ties to established IP. And, for the most part, we're getting fully immersive lands that have allowed Imagineering to stretch their legs a bit. I guess I'd like to believe that, for all his business wonky-talk, Mr. Iger understands in some way the importance of the parks to all of us. Do I lament the continuing "pricing leverage" being exhibited? Of course! I have four kids, and I promised my oldest daughter during our last trip 5 years ago that we'd come back "soon." "Soon" is turning to "not soon" because we just can't afford it. I am glad to see that Disney is spending money in the parks, though, after years of not doing so. Perhaps I'm just a glass half-full guy (but not a Disney apologist- just one who would appreciate being able to make a return visit, IP or no IP).
The next CEO doesn’t even need to get it, just have enough respect for it to delegate to someone who does.Please, Disney Gods, let him really retire as scheduled and let the next CEO get it.
It would add even more capacity if it had more than 2 rides in this 14 acres.When Star Wars opens in Anaheim in June and in Florida later in the year, that’s adding capacity. You’re adding 14 acres of land [each], more rides, and more things for people to do. It’s the biggest land we’ve ever built.
The next CEO doesn’t even need to get it, just have enough respect for it to delegate to someone who does.
He really only sees parks as an extension of the film side of the buisness. No big surprise there.
He’s such a.... businessman.
True. Still depressing to hear it spoken so ineloquently-yet-succintly from man entrusted with the reigns of the industry. For anyone who is a fan of the ARTFORM of theme park design, the number one guy thinks the parks exist only as a trasnferral vehicle for film and tv IP , not as a unique creative engine in and of themselves.
Please, Disney Gods, let him really retire as scheduled and let the next CEO get it.
To be fair, this was an interview with a business publication, so it would tend to be more business focused. I suspect the tone and content of the interview may have been different had it been an interview with Attractions Magazine.Reading his comments... My God. He's utterly clueless about what a theme park is. To him, they are nothing but a revenue stream, a vessel to grow profit margins:
"...growing our returns..."
"...raise our margins..."
"...pricing leverage..."
Increasing capacity? Maybe in Anaheim, but DHS will continue to not have expanded past it's peak capacity of years past, if I'm not mistaken. If I am, I'm more than happy to see the numbers and admit so. I'm surprised he restrained himself from uttering, "Guests can ride the movies they love!!!".
With his statements, he proved to me, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that he "doesn't get it".
And spare us the BS about going to the parks and taking your grandchildren, Bob. You don't go there are a regular Joe Sixpack and you know it.
Interesting last question.
What’s your favorite thing when you go to the parks—or do you just look at it as a businessman?
I look at it as a human being. I go there and I marvel at how many people are there having the time of their lives. You just get the sense that in a world that can at times feel dark and as sinister as it is, these are people that have escaped all of that. They have spent time and good money, I will say, to provide themselves and their friends, their family, their loved ones, an experience that not only is going to make them feel good, but that they’re going to remember forever. That is never lost on me. I appreciate it as an executive, as a human being, and as a parent. I have grandchildren I take there.
I wonder if he connects with the complaint department
Extend the contract for another three years......True. Still depressing to hear it spoken so ineloquently-yet-succintly from man entrusted with the reigns of the industry. For anyone who is a fan of the ARTFORM of theme park design, the number one guy thinks the parks exist only as a trasnferral vehicle for film and tv IP , not as a unique creative engine in and of themselves.
Please, Disney Gods, let him really retire as scheduled and let the next CEO get it.
He’s such a.... businessman.
But the strategy works whether we like it or not. It's just not a long-term one. And he's naive to not believe both types of things can exist. Hello, Expedition Everest ....
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.