I actually believe the poor performance of the film is mostly due to people thinking it will be like the fourth one and not bothering. A lot of younger viewers only started with the fourth one and it tainted their flavor of the entire series as well. The movie was actually really good in my opinion and I really don't care what some people may have to say because the theater I was in was packed and had a massive applause at the end. It could just pick up with word of mouth later on I mean it's not going anywhere it'll be on Disney Plus and all. That Being said, I due hope that they do make this land, there is kinda one in Disney Sea, though not directly (Raging Spirits is basically an Indiana Jones Ride same deal). I think that a land that looks like an exploration camp with a temple maybe the ride from Cali or a newer version of it with a new story, or perhaps a better roller coaster, indoor with effects, that makes it look like its in the caves from Temple of Doom. The Indy Stunt Show can cover the fighting/anti nazi side of Indy while the ride could cover the mystical and exploration side.Hopefully the poor perfromance of the new Indiana Jones movie doesnt kill any further conversation about a land dedicated to the film franchise. I really believe Indiana Jones is a concept that could thrive on Disney+.
It's absolutely something people would love. But do the dumb execs see it that way? Probably not, sadly. If they did, we'd have gotten an Indy land like that at the same time as Galaxy's Edge.Whether people like the new Indy movie or not, DHS park goers would LOVE an engaging, beautifully designed Indy land with a few new attractions... That is the fact. Make some great merch and sell it in the gift shops there... A beautifully themed restaurant in the temple ruins... As long as it is beautiful and immersive, people will come, people will love it....regardless of if the movie tie in is a hit or not... as a matter of fact, the attraction could bolster the movie's popularity...
Splash Mountain's extreme popularity in the parks is because it is a great attraction...not because the film was relevant...
Disney's in sort of a sad state rn. This is probably their lowest point since the end of the Eisner era in the early '00s...except they don't even have someone like Pixar working with them making all-time classics.Like what exactly? Marvel is out for WDW, Star wars is being done to death, Toy Story Land has also been played out as far as theme park use at WDW...Jungle Cruise didn't hit their mark, Elemental came and went, Clearly Indy did not do as expected...So what is new and hip?...I mean, aside from Olivia Rodrigo...lol
They can form a partnership with Taylor Swift to make Swiftland. It will be hyper realistic if they make all of the attractions VQ and ILL only to immerse people in the experience of having trouble getting tickets.Like what exactly? Marvel is out for WDW, Star wars is being done to death, Toy Story Land has also been played out as far as theme park use at WDW...Jungle Cruise didn't hit their mark, Elemental came and went, Clearly Indy did not do as expected...So what is new and hip?...I mean, aside from Olivia Rodrigo...lol
Indy deserves a vekoma family coaster or a premier family launch in the style of mummy. I don’t know why they picked the cheapest of the fairground coasters!I'd be afraid they'd clone that horrific pinfari coast they used at DLP.
It could work at AK as well The dinoland area and a ride rebrand, stunt show relocation and another new attraction.
I mean, to be fair the queue once you get indoors is long enough for that to be understandable.That won't happen anytime soon with how cheap they seem to be about AC. Half of the Remy line being outside when that entire area is brand new is ridiculous.
Yeah. That coaster made me feel like someone boxed me in the ears. Disney could certainly do better than that.The idea for the DLP coaster is good, the actual ride is not great... I have been on it a few times... It is also incredibly short, and what everyone wants is an indoor coaster for Indy...through a temple but with cinematic effects...or the ore car coaster from Temple Of Doom... The Temple Du Peril coaster seems like a quick add-on when the park was built because they were light on attractions.
I love the idea of one massive show building containing multiple attractions... Like the original ideas for Indy in Disneyland or the never-built Thunder Mesa/Western River Expedition...A huge show building like that might also give DHS a bit of a skyline as well... but properly themed....
Disneys most recent coaster cost half a billion dollars.The last thing Disney or UNiversal need is another blot of coasters.
Enough already. We know why management love them - as opposed to big major attraction they are relatively cheap. Pick any standard coaster of the shelf, paint it blue, attach the letter 'S' to the front, bit of themeing for the queue and call it 'Superman' etc
Enough of this nonsense now.
The idea for the DLP coaster is good, the actual ride is not great... I have been on it a few times... It is also incredibly short, and what everyone wants is an indoor coaster for Indy...through a temple but with cinematic effects...or the ore car coaster from Temple Of Doom... The Temple Du Peril coaster seems like a quick add-on when the park was built because they were light on attractions.
I love the idea of one massive show building containing multiple attractions... Like the original ideas for Indy in Disneyland or the never-built Thunder Mesa/Western River Expedition...A huge show building like that might also give DHS a bit of a skyline as well... but properly themed....
Disneys most recent coaster cost half a billion dollars.
It's a shame. Those coasters only had nice things to say about you.Then it's a horrific waste in my opinion. But at least there were attempts to configure an actual attraction, themeing, some form of nonsensical storyline, etc. What i take great offense are you standard coasters.
I wouldn't categorize any Disney coaster in the last 20 years as being 'standard' - they may not be overly thrilling like a Cedar Fair coaster, but each has a unique story that makes it more memorable than a typical coaster.Then it's a horrific waste in my opinion. But at least there were attempts to configure an actual attraction, themeing, some form of nonsensical storyline, etc. What i take great offense are you standard coasters.
I agree that both Universal parks, Magic Kingdom, and Hollywood Studios don't need any more roller coasters. But Animal Kingdom and Epcot only have one each.The last thing Disney or UNiversal need is another blot of coasters.
Right on with you. If you place the era in the 30s during Indys prime and go all out, it’d be great. But Disney doesn’t really care for Jones, and the fact that we got this movie was made is a miracle. Either way they’ll move on and obsess with Star WarsWhether people like the new Indy movie or not, DHS park goers would LOVE an engaging, beautifully designed Indy land with a few new attractions... That is the fact. Make some great merch and sell it in the gift shops there... A beautifully themed restaurant in the temple ruins... As long as it is beautiful and immersive, people will come, people will love it....regardless of if the movie tie in is a hit or not... as a matter of fact, the attraction could bolster the movie's popularity...
Splash Mountain's extreme popularity in the parks is because it is a great attraction...not because the film was relevant...
Good PointFilms don’t have to make a profit on their theatrical run for Disney to build a ride for them. Take a look at Tron and PatF
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.