I feel like this might have to do more with the popularity and impact of the series itself rather than this specific film’s performance. The later two sequels and spin-off movies for Star Wars didn’t do as well as Disney envisioned but they still went full steam ahead with Star Wars in the parks because of merch sales and cultural relevance. Even though they knew that their most recent pieces of Star Wars media hadn’t been the best to resonate, the franchise as a whole was still beloved. Before we write-off an Indy land completely, this might end up being the case. Even if this most recent film isn’t the most beloved, Indy might still have a fighting chance in the parks if the franchise as a whole is still deemed to be beloved and relevant.
Pandora is actually a good example. Avatar got itself an entire land even though an Avatar film hadn’t been released in years and Avatar 2 hadn’t even been announced yet. There weren’t fresh box office numbers to fuel a land but Disney saw potential in the property as a whole and saw its untapped ability to translate well to a theme park.
Although an Indy land would be an easier sell if Dial of Destiny hit the billion mark, Disney’s decision-making has proven that the company doesn’t always look at the most recent box office numbers to yay or nay a property.