If you would like the security protocols reworked, then I would be better able to understand your point of view. However, jumping to an extreme is rarely a solution. For lack of better comparison, I’ll use Universal. Now, obviously, they have security once you reach where the bridges interesect. However, outside of that area, there was little security in the garages. Groups would meet to fight in the garages shortly after Covid, and I saw Orlando PD, OCSO, and what looked to be the SWAT team having to break up fights after people started running. It seemed as though the girlfriends of the people fighting had run from the location of the fight, and with all the noise, people seemed to believe there was an active shooter. Had there been more security in the garages, Orlando PD and the OCSO could have been deployed sooner. Perhaps the fight could have even been broken up before starting mass hysteria.
Obviously this can never be confirmed if security would have changed the situation at all. We can make correlations, but sure, it is hard to say that security causes less fights and violence to happen. However, I do think that less hysteria would have been caused had the incident happened inside of the parks (given that all bags are screened prior to entry).
Now, I can understand that one might think that uniformed officers and security might not effect violence and crime rates in an area, but I don’t think that one can argue that screening all bags prior to entry doesn’t help protect against a mass terrorist attack or mass act of violence.