copcarguyp71
Well-Known Member
Yes, but once again, you are not the only person that goes to WDW. The vast majority of guests have never seen it until, at least, their first visit. It's old for you and folks like the rest of us that insist on going back to the same attractions year after year after year. To the first timer it is a brand new experience.
From what I remember, energy hasn't changed all that much since it was filmed. How does one update it. Should we drop the whole premise of how oil forms in the earth and modernize it to show that oil, in fact, comes from gas stations.
Yes, and my reply was to the guy who was saying it did not need anything who has not been going nearly as long as I have and this really was just my personal opinion nor did I ever elude that I was the only person attending the parks or tell anyone they needed to subscribe to my thoughts. I am not trying to sway anyone's opinion and in all essence trying to change how anyone views the parks using postings on a forum is as effective as getting a religious zealot to believe in Darwinism through the use of bumper stickers.
Now...in my mind the whole premise of UOE surrounds fossil fuels and stems from Exxon's original sponsorship. The pavillion does very little to educate on ANY other forms of energy such as Solar, Wind, Geothermal, water power or any burgeoning forms of energy on the horizon which I really feel it should other than a glossing over. Nor does the pavillion provide for any sort of pre or post experience that allows for independent discovery by guests. So those are ways I personally feel the experience could be plussed and improved. To do this in my utopian mindset...scrap it and start over. Two to three of the ride vehicles remain dead most all of the time anyway and with all of the failing ride elements it is not that far of a stretch. Every other pavillion on that side of the park (except for poor WOL) have been gutted and replaced and in my very own opinion WOL time has come.