Matt_Black
Well-Known Member
Why? Just because something is a desirable benefit doesn't mean it is the park's reason for being.
Alright, then if learning in a fun fashion isn't Epcot's raison d'etre, what is?
Why? Just because something is a desirable benefit doesn't mean it is the park's reason for being.
Since some have posted their wishes for a revitalized EPCOT, allow me to add mine.
My understanding has been that Horizons was a sequel to a Carousel of Progress. I'd like to see the WOL pavilion either repurposed or replaced with a combo of a transplanted COP and a new Horizons. Due to the space limitations, I suspect this may require a new, more vertical structure.
From my perspective, this would put a treasured part of the Walt Disney legacy in the most appropriate park, return what was, IMO, one of EPCOTs better attractions, and open up a space for an addition to Tomorrowland.
Let me go one step further. Instead of one country, add a "global village" in World Showcase with architecture from multiple nations not presently represented. And move "It's a Small World" there. This would have the further benefit of freeing up a considerable area in Fantasyland for Frozen or other attraction(s).
Again, just a couple of my wishes.
In all seriousness, I've always felt that in WS you ought to have historical personages from the various countries out and about. There are plenty of non-controversial, famous people from each country that if they were walking about in appropriate period garb, people would stop, get pictures with them, and it would be a different sub-subset of autographs than just the traditional characters. "Mom, I need to get Emperor Qianlong's autograph before we go home!" You could even augment the famous actual historical figures with famous folk from literature from a few countries (Sherlock Holmes, say). Plus, you could have a few generalized iconic folk (samurai in Japan, etc.) out and about. If done right, it could work really well. This might be a terrible idea, but I've always kind of liked it.
Don't bulldoze WOL...turn it into a Weather pavilion! Storm Rider can go in here...the dome can have ever changing weather patterns...it could be spectacular...
and with our changing weather patterns lately this is VERY relevant...
Which is probably one of the biggest disappointments. More digital media would offer a means of keeping the narrative more up-to-date, but Disney has failed to take advantage of such possibilities.Not bad, but please don't bulldoze Universe of Energy. It's too easily updated with a new show, being mostly video based. Living with the Land and Spaceship Earth are really the only original Future World E-tickets left; They need only minor updates which don't disturb the fundamentals of the current presentation.
Meh. Updating and refreshing? Yes. All-out rebuilding? I wouldn't go that far.
Horizons is the perfect example. Imagine (just for a moment ) that it were refreshed in '94? And I highly doubt it would have taken anything near an all-out rebuild to keep it relevant. The physical sets including the wardrobe and dialogue could have been tweaked. The Omnimax scene could have been completely updated as well as the choose your own ending sequences. The Beach Boy and Red-Head dialogue tweaked or swapped out as well. (This is where screens, when properly used, can be helpful in maintaining relevance! )
Yes, I realize this would take money and a sponsor, but updating and refreshing just goes with the EPCOT territory, and that is what will set it apart from other parks and resorts. Problem is, either Disney or sponsors need to be reminded of that (GM/Chevy excluded)! This re-imagining of EPCOT needs to address this concept whether Disney decides to ditch the sponsorship model or not. No more character additions/movie tie-ins/dark space band-aids!
The point of Epcot is to get kids interested in the various aspects of the world around them.
Alright, then if learning in a fun fashion isn't Epcot's raison d'etre, what is?
It's not splitting hairs, in the beginning it was very intentional to keep them out.
Ok - I made it 16 pages into this thread before my eyes started going crossed. EPCOT is my favorite park and it really does need some TLC. Despite was has been said in 21 pages of this thread I'm going to say what *I* would like to see happen with EPCOT
FW:
SSE - fix the narration & fix the ending
Energy - bulldoze it & put something new up - E-ticket please
WoL - see above bulldoze it and put something new up
M:S - I don't ride it (makes me sick) but it's fine IMO
TT - haven't seen the Tron overlay yet
Seas - needs...something - what that is I don't know but it needs...something
Living with the land - again...needs...something?
Soarin' - new film
Imagination - please please PLEASE fix this attraction and bring back imageworks!!
HISTA/EO - new film
Oddessey restaurant - make it a restaurant again
Innoventions - I never go in there so honestly I don't know what to do with it.
WS:
New country(ies) with more rides. Something on the west side of the lagoon perhaps - something to disperse the crowds.
bring back tapestry of nations or something similar
Illuminations:
fix/replace it - it's essentially been the same show for how many years (decades?)now?
I can't find any photos of Mickey and Goofy in Epcot opening day. I know what costumes you are talking about as I have seen them in promotional images but my understanding is that they were added at a later date when people complained (A similar situation occurred at Disney's California Adventure when it first opened that there was a lack of Disney characters).
EDIT: So far looks like I'm correct http://www.imagineeringdisney.com/blog/tag/epcot Characters were added by Michael Eisner when he took over later on.
Epcot's early days did have some characters but they were original creations for the park like the World Showcase children:
Storm rider isn't very good actuallyDon't bulldoze WOL...turn it into a Weather pavilion! Storm Rider can go in here...the dome can have ever changing weather patterns...it could be spectacular...
and with our changing weather patterns lately this is VERY relevant...
would have to bulldoze, have you seen the condition of the dome? check it out on google earth, oxidation and corrosion all over, and there are tiles discolored, fading... sure didnt use alucabond on that dome.Storm rider isn't very good actually
Storm rider isn't very good actually
Not saying that it's not the case, don't have a background in construction, but based on that, isn't it still the case that they could save the shell of the building by repairing it, thus saving quite a bit of $ that could be spent putting something in there?would have to bulldoze, have you seen the condition of the dome? check it out on google earth, oxidation and corrosion all over, and there are tiles discolored, fading... sure didnt use alucabond on that dome.
Sorry, I'm still quite a few pages behind, but...
This "bring back xx and xx and xx!" trend is disturbing. Isn't EPCOT supposed to be about the future? Why bring back rides from the years past- that were removed/rebuilt instead of trying to either reinvent the ride for future children and adults to enjoy or build something NEW?
How many times has Disney brought something back from the crypt- is it just two? (serious question, I really don't know.) The Tiki room being reverted to original form, minus the fountain, and Capt. EO (personally never seen so I can't really comment) And of those brought back from the dead, who still whined and complained about them missing effects/scenes/etc?
IMHO, the direction for EPCOT should be "new" and not returning to old rides. They worked in their time and they served their purpose, but it's time to look forward.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.