Cmdr_Crimson
Well-Known Member
This is my response to this post...
I hope you're wrong.Unfortunately, I can.
I hope you're wrong.
Do you have any insider info or permits that were filed that might indicate they are moving in this direction? The last thing I remember Disney doing to this ride was when they updated the screens last year.
Remember, what we call permits are actually notices of commencement which are issued right before work starts. It's very unlike a large project would get to that point without one of our insiders getting wind of it first.
I guess if they do it right, and the attraction is E+ ticket awesome, it would be easier to say goodbye to Figment. But if they just do a P&F dark ride like the new Ariel's Undersea Adventures (as much as I like the Ursala AA, it is defiantly not a E ticket attraction), I think Disney fans would freak out about losing Figment again. I think this is the bottom line, if they are going to remove Figment from the pavilion again they better replace it with an E ticket that can help ease the pain. However, I don't think Figment is going anywhere because of the strong merchandise sales and strong connection to Epcot in general.
This sentence is a really great sum-up of the 3 paragraph post I made a few pages ago! Seriously... it says it all...I don't want them to replace Figment, but if they do so with a fantastic ride, I won't cry over it.
Y'know while I agree with you (admittedly mostly because since 1983 Figment just "spoke" to me and was always a staple) there is also a part of me that remembers that Walt's vision for anything he did was always to keep moving forward with new ideas. Now that said, when it comes to "characters" that's not necessarily true obviously because Mickey isn't going anywhere but... Figment has a direct association with a ride and was created specifically for said attraction in 1982. He's not a character that exists outside that world in anyway. I would hate to see him gone but I also kind of see the point that he's been around forever and, especially now with the horrible version of the attraction guests experience, his purpose is lost. He was central to the original attraction but in this version, he was added after a poorly done refurb as a result of people screaming to bring him back. What did we get as a result? Figment overload... just flat out make you sick of the color purple by the end of the ride. The last scene is just a sparkling example of that in my opinion. It's like they said "You want Figment back? Well here ya go... now you're gonna puke purple all day after riding!"
It's one of those 50/50 things to me. I'd love to see something done with the pavillion that harkens back to the original concept of truly focusing on imagination and the great things that come from it. I'd love for that to mean that Figment is a continued part of it (where it makes sense) but I also know that without basically just recreating what they had in '82, to really do a complete overhaul of story and attraction, it probably would require a fresh look without the incuberance of the past. The only thing I'm sure of is that the current attraction is just a sad use of a fantastic pavillion that had an amazing amount of space that is now wasted.
Ohhhh dear dear dear... your comments are not falling on deaf ears. You're preaching to the choir. I grew up with Figment... he was my world when I was younger. I have an unbelievable amount of Figgy memoriablia/pins/souveneirs. My first time going to WDW with my now hubby I thought I scared him away after he saw my reaction to the Figment character being out for a M&G (picture a 29 year old woman running and screaming and hugging a person in a costume as if they had seen God). Trust me... I get you! My comment you quoted was just from the perspective of why, regardless of my love of Figment, I can see why some say it's time for him to go.Jenn, this may have been true when he was created, but Figment evolved into the heart and soul of that section of Epcot, if not more. For many people, he is the unofficial mascot of Epcot. He's also a huge merchandise seller for Disney. If Disney wants to get rid of Journey into Imagination then fine, but they need to consider making Figment an official representative of Epcot or give him some larger role within Epcot. In my huble opinion, Figment is to Epcot what Mickey Mouse is to the Magic Kingdom, inseperable entities that are core parts of each other.
In my huble opinion, Figment is to Epcot what Mickey Mouse is to the Magic Kingdom, inseperable entities that are core parts of each other.
LMAO!! Sorry I had to do it!
Bumping. Apparently it's just a headquarters for the Perry game being set up inside the old Figment's Place building
Hopefully it stays that way.
A full pavillion replacement would probably be based on how that live-action/animated combo movie for theaters does. Otherwise, this seems pretty "until the show is cancelled" levels of temporary.Is this just a small sign of whats to come though as a pavilion replacement as a whole? oy!!! more cartooning ahead.
A full pavillion replacement would probably be based on how that live-action/animated combo movie for theaters does. Otherwise, this seems pretty "until the show is cancelled" levels of temporary.
yeah me too! What about new 3D movie.Is this just a small sign of whats to come though as a pavilion replacement as a whole? oy!!! more cartooning ahead.
I kind of like it. Especially since it's only supposedly replacing Figment's Place and not Captain EO or Journey into Imagination.Imagination needs help, but this is AWFUL.
Imagination needs help, but this is AWFUL.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.