Figgy1
Well-Known Member
Thank You very much!!!!!!!!!!!!I definitely think it needs a reboot, but why can't we still have Figment?
His identity is intrinsically linked to Epcot.
Thank You very much!!!!!!!!!!!!I definitely think it needs a reboot, but why can't we still have Figment?
His identity is intrinsically linked to Epcot.
I am thinking that it is the general public that has lost their imagination.It'd be the perfect way to prove Disney has lost all its Imagination.
I am thinking that it is the general public that has lost their imagination.
I have no doubt that there are some simply incredible ideas floating around WDI that will never see the light of day simply because the average theme park guest will never appreciate it. The sad reality is building attraction to please the 5% of us that appreciate detail, story, originality, quality, etc seems to be a recipe for financial failure. The other 95% wants characters they recognize tacked onto some sort of mindless attraction.
I refuse to support any non-original toons in Epcot. Massive fail of an idea.
I refuse to support any non-original toons in Epcot. Massive fail of an idea.
Imagination has been getting some looks lately...
But personally....a big No Thanks to Phineas and Ferb. (Whoever they are. I couldn't pick them out of a line-up.)
I refuse to support any non-original toons in Epcot. Massive fail of an idea.
I agree and I would hope that people's reasoning for not wanting P&F here is because it's a TV show with little staying power rather than that they think it's not a good show. The show is witty, clever, and funny.I panned P&F until I actually watched it: it's a fantastic show. Extremely clever (sometimes in a startlingly highbrow fashion), often hilarious, and appealing to both kids and adults (the latter in that sort of subversive, old school "Looney Tunes" way).
I have no great affinity for the vast, vast majority of Disney media content, but this show has been a flat out winner.
I agree and I would hope that people's reasoning for not wanting P&F here is because it's a TV show with little staying power rather than that they think it's not a good show. The show is witty, clever, and funny.
People have shown Disney that is what they want. 1982 Epcot was brilliant. The attractions exuded quality and story from every pore. It was also regarded by the general public as the most boring place on earth.I'd respectfully disagree. I think that's what Disney thinks people want, yes. But while many of use look at the normal guest with disgust, I still think most people would appreciate a great, original attraction.
Disney is just afraid to do it.
I panned P&F until I actually watched it: it's a fantastic show. Extremely clever (sometimes in a startlingly highbrow fashion), often hilarious, and appealing to both kids and adults (the latter in that sort of subversive, old school "Looney Tunes" way).
I have no great affinity for the vast, vast majority of Disney media content, but this show has been a flat out winner.
People have shown Disney that is what they want. 1982 Epcot was brilliant. The attractions exuded quality and story from every pore. It was also regarded by the general public as the most boring place on earth.
I do agree that Disney is afraid, but with good reason.
That is honestly the first time I've heard someone refer to the show as clever.
People have shown Disney that is what they want. 1982 Epcot was brilliant. The attractions exuded quality and story from every pore. It was also regarded by the general public as the most boring place on earth.
I do agree that Disney is afraid, but with good reason.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.