The product has been bad.You can deconstruct the plot of any film (especially a Star Wars film, which all have fairly weak plots) to make it sound bad.
But even you have to admit that these events share almost nothing in common with one another besides the bare structure that you've already stated. Some retread, huh?
Not trueLet's just be honest here. Star Wars fans pretty much dislike anything except The Empire Strikes Back.
Perhaps.The product has been bad.
This”debate” is just like 2005.
Not true
Star Wars fans just want something semi coherent within the IP
Not the Manhattan project
Starkiller Base is just dumb, the worst sort of fan service and definitely contradicts the then state of the First Order and why the New Republic dismissed it as a personal problem between Leia and Ben.
Yeah...I’m a Star Wars guy who has enjoyed a lot of the character development of Star Trek over the years...particularly ds9Perhaps.
I consider myself a Star Wars fan, but admittedly a more casual one. For hardcore fandom, I am a Star Trek guy.
My wife and I watched The Rise of Skywalker over the weekend for the first time. I enjoyed it. Thought it was a good film.
But that's about as far as I've analyzed it. If it were a Trek film, I'd probably pick it apart. But I was content to just enjoy it and not think much more about it.
Yeah...I’m a Star Wars guy who has enjoyed a lot of the character development of Star Trek over the years...particularly ds9
Big fan of Ron Moore material and the Meyer/nimoy lead films.
Rise of Skywalker made zero sense to me...as little as 8 in a frustrating, intersecting plane. Disney has been a mess. Frankly.
But I’m starting to see the benefits in D+ and the serial opportunities at development.
LFL has not ability to make a film at this point. What’s their score out of 5(movies)? Honestly?
New blood/direction before films is my suggestion.
I wish somebody would. He is like Teflon !! Nothin sticksHe sends Mike to take out Lalo?
Tough call for me. I grew up on TNG and still have quite a fondness for those characters. But DS9 is definitely the most well-written and well-developed series of the bunch.DS9 is the best of Star Trek post original series.
Tough call for me. I grew up on TNG and still have quite a fondness for those characters. But DS9 is definitely the most well-written and well-developed series of the bunch.
Tough call for me. I grew up on TNG and still have quite a fondness for those characters. But DS9 is definitely the most well-written and well-developed series of the bunch.
Very close for me.I think TNG has the best characters, and it has some of the best (and arguably the best) episodes as well. It just also has some absolutely terrible episodes.
I don't think it's easy to compare the two, though, with DS9 becoming serialized. Serialized shows generally have a week to week advantage over non-serialized shows in terms of development, writing, etc., which is why TNG has individual episodes that are as good or better than anything in DS9, but also has those absolute skippable clunkers because they don't affect anything else going forward.
But even you have to admit that these events share almost nothing in common with one another besides the bare structure that you've already stated. Some retread, huh?
I know I’m gonna regret getting involved in this but...We now are only 5 years into this new Star Wars canon and Lucasfilm employees are now saying that it's all fake, cannon doesn't matter, chose what you want to believe is canon, which is because of how badly they have screwed it up by having no one in charge of the story.
I love Star Wars. That said, without nostalgia, the majority of them individually are terrible movies.My simple TLJ take:
It is a great individual movie. It is a terrible Star Wars movie.
Subversion is great for story telling. But when all you do is subvert, then you aren't subverting.No, you're missing the point, The Last Jedi is a film about Star Wars not about the story being told. If of course by function does do a bit of that, but it's not the priority.
Do you really think Rian sat down at his desk and just happened by coincidence to write Rey going on a simplified version of Luke's story? Of course not. The whole "subversion" element is because we know the story. The film is about taking what you expect in something like Star Wars, but doing it differently.
Rian's discussed this many time. He created DJ to be a character you think is a guy like Han Solo, you expect him to be the rogueish bad boy, with a heart of gold. Then he turns out not to be. It's about subverting. When these ideas are the priority the writing suffers and you get things such as Finn and Rose ending up in jail for a parking ticket. Locked in a cell with someone with all the skills they need who also has the cell door key. It's not, "where does the story go." It's simply moving onto the next idea the writer wanted to explore. The film is full of these jumps.
Poe is meant to be the hero, who defies orders, you as the audience know this trope, expect him to be right. Subversion is that he's not right. The film is driven by these ideas, little explorations. It's not the story that is driving the events of the film. Which is why so many fans hated it, story matters to them.
This also means the events aren't earned. Over the course of a week, in-universe Rey has now gone from not knowing the Force of the Jedi's were real. To basically becoming a Jedi with no training, teaming up with the bad guy to defeat The Powerful Supreme leader. Does that many any sense from a story perspective? Does it make sense in Star Wars? Do you honestly think Rey going on a super-fast ultra simplified version of Luke's three-film, multi-year journey, came from anywhere other than deliberately putting her on that path?
The story and logic is sacrificed to do this. The good thing about my analysis is that it explains why people like the film and why people dislike the film. The film simply wasn't prioritised to create the next bold and exciting chapter in the story. It was about making a somewhat meta, deconstruction on what Star Wars is. Which should not have been done for a SAGA film and the backlash speaks to that.
We now are only 5 years into this new Star Wars canon and Lucasfilm employees are now saying that it's all fake, cannon doesn't matter, chose what you want to believe is canon, which is because of how badly they have screwed it up by having no one in charge of the story.
Exactly. Rouge one and the Mandalorian are absolute proof that fans don't hate everything.Not true
Star Wars fans just want something semi coherent within the IP
Not the Manhattan project
By the end of last jedi, all the "subverting" had the opposite effect. It became extremely predictable what was going to happen.Subversion is great for story telling. But when all you do is subvert, then you aren't subverting.
Know your rouges...Exactly. Rouge one and the Mandalorian are absolute proof that fans don't hate everything.
Know your rouges...
Rouge One............................................................................Rogue One
View attachment 471177View attachment 471178
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.