Iger and Chapek Livid With Lucasfilm

D

doctornick

Well-Known Member
WDW Pro said:
I'm just speculating, but it does seem very convenient for changing the narrative.
Click to expand...

What narrative? I mean, there's always some small section of nerdom that will dissect any little piece of information about Star Wars and other geeky things, so sure some minuscule number of people might be talking about this. But this rumor isn't a "thing" in any way for anyone in the general public and sure as heck isn't something that would influence any significant decision making like when to stream a major movie on Disney+.
 
ᗩLᘿᑕ ✨ ᗩζᗩᗰ

ᗩLᘿᑕ ✨ ᗩζᗩᗰ

HAPPY NEW YEAR!
Premium Member
That grocer needs to walkback the display and wait till May 4th. Then do a first come first serve promotion. $2 per bottle as an impulse buy sounds reasonable. At $6.99 a pack these things are going to be gone before the end of the day. (and sold at much higher prices elsewhere)
It won't be long now that the SW nerdom and twitterverse is aware of them.
 
MisterPenguin

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
WDW Pro said:
Food for thought:

Does anyone else find it interesting that on Thursday I reported consternation and high level meetings called immediately with Lucasfilm... and on Monday they announce Rise of Skywalker is suddenly coming to Disney Plus two months early?
Click to expand...

A whole bunch of tent poles have been coming to D+ early, like Frozen II.

Over and over Iger has stated that D+ is number one priority. And the CV crisis has everyone attuned to home entertainment. So... not surprised at all.

So, a more likely scenario is... more likely.
 
MisterPenguin

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
After the Gunn incident, is it any surprise that anyone in talks with Disney at whatever stage is going to be told that Disney doesn't want another Gunn incident, so, start scrubbing.

So, yeah, that may mean that Headland was in talks with Disney/LucasFilm for some project.

And that got leaked by someone. Who know whom? Could be the PR firm hired to scrub her social media.

I'm sure there's very few here who can say that if they were to be hired by Disney that a bunch of Disney haters couldn't use something you said on the 'net against you to get to Disney.
 
Last edited:
R

Ravenclaw78

Well-Known Member
Animaniac93-98 said:
Clicked on the hashtag. This is probably my favourite so far:



Says a lot about how inept Disney's legal department is.
Click to expand...


The very next tweet in the series reads "The above legal language applies ONLY to replies to this tweet using #MayThe4th and mentioning
@DisneyPlus. These replies may appear in something special on May the 4th!" Pretty sure they could have made that more clear in the initial tweet even with Twitter's character limits, but I suspect that they're covered legally.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom