Hollywood Studios Lacking Theme

This is why America is one of the 'Largest' nations in the world ... because people gripe about having to walk roughly 1/4 mile or a 1/2 Kilometer ... seriously?!? That blows my mind. :lol:

This is true. When at Disney World I don't mind walking in the slightest.. I need it after some of meals consumed there:lol:
 

PrincessM

New Member
I would just like to say, I LOVE DHS, but they could eliminate the Narnia attraction or upgrade the theme of it. To wait 30 mins to stand in a room and watch, what basically is like trailer of something you already seen is kind of a huge bore. There was nothing to it and could be developed into a really extroadinary attraction considering the Narnia films.

Aside from that, TOT and the Citizens of Hollywood are by far the best! and just the atmosphere of DHS is amazing, I love it.
 

janoimagine

Well-Known Member
This is true. When at Disney World I don't mind walking in the slightest.. I need it after some of meals consumed there:lol:

:D Ha Ha. I know, right? ... Seriously, your at a theme park ... have we really become that lazy as a society that we can't walk that far in the course of a day?

Agreed, the meatloaf at the 50's Prime Time for lunch, although good, makes we want to run a few miles to work it off. :lol:
 

Wilt Dasney

Well-Known Member
This was discussed in another thread just last week: http://forums.wdwmagic.com/showthread.php?t=687426

As I said at some length then, the biggest issue with DHS is its split personality. The front of the park is a thematic marvel, all the way down Hollywood Boulevard and off down Sunset. I'll even throw in Echo Lake, although there's not much there.

Behind the hat, it's a mess — a haphazard thematic jumble, and a lot of what is thrown together back there just isn't very interesting.
 

Enchantâmes

Active Member
That's exactly what I said. SINCE A Bug's Life. As in, "I've been in college SINCE I graduated from high school." I'm not INCLUDING my high school years in that statement, just like I wasn't INCLUDING "A Bug's Life."
Sorry but when you said since A Bug's Life that meant starting with A Bug's life, and in case you didn't know that is how the English language works, it doesn't just simply bend it's rules to make your statements correct. You were wrong get over it. :wave:
 

Wilt Dasney

Well-Known Member
If you start throwing nonsense at me sure. :rolleyes:
Ah. Well, as long as you have a good reason for being pedantic. I'd hate to think you just got your jollies by being a jerk to random people online. Good to know that's not the case!

For the record, either usage of "since" is acceptable. Bolded examples below would fall in line with the usage you were unaware the English language allowed for...until now. You're welcome. :)
since

 /sɪns/ Show Spelled[sins] Show IPA
–adverb 1. from then till now (often prec. by ever ): He was elected in 1978 and has been president ever since.

2. between a particular past time and the present; subsequently: She at first refused, but has since consented.

3. ago; before now: long since.


–preposition 4. continuously from or counting from: It has been warm since noon.

5. between a past time or event and the present: There have been many changes since the war.


–conjunction

6. in the period following the time when: He has written once since he left.

7. continuously from or counting from the time when: He has been busy since he came.

8. because; inasmuch as: Since you're already here, you might as well stay.
 

Enchantâmes

Active Member
Ah. Well, as long as you have a good reason for being pedantic. I'd hate to think you just got your jollies by being a jerk to random people online. Good to know that's not the case!

For the record, either usage of "since" is acceptable. Bolded examples below would fall in line with the usage you were unaware the English language allowed for...until now. You're welcome. :)
Yes but the way he stated it implied that it started with A Bug's Life. IMHO if we wanted to avoid confusion he should just not said anything about a Bug's life to begin with and said starting with Toy Story 2 or since Toy Story 2. Either way A bug's life did not do as well as Tangled, his statement was incorrect, and my point has been made.

Good day Sir. :wave:
 

trr1

Well-Known Member
Yes but the way he stated it implied that it started with A Bug's Life. IMHO if we wanted to avoid confusion he should just not said anything about a Bug's life to begin with and said starting with Toy Story 2 or since Toy Story 2. Either way A bug's life did not do as well as Tangled, his statement was incorrect, and my point has been made.

Good day Sir. :wave:
you for got to put "have" in between not and said:wave:
 

muse1983

Well-Known Member
People young, old and childless visit Disney World every single day. My wife and I have no children and even if we for some reason (will never happen, we cant wait to have kids) never had any we would still visit as many times as humanly possible.
 

muse1983

Well-Known Member
People go to Walt Disney World to share the magical time with their children that they had when they were a kid. Disney is successful due to so many different aspects. Except Disney lacks to attract the worlds thrill seekers because of it's ability to not have an abundance of modern rides. If Disney was to have this abundance of modern rides, I would argue that the thrill seekers throughout the country would consider going to a Walt Disney Park rather then a Six Flags, Busch Gardens, or Universal Park more then previously considered. You need both ends of the spectrum....A little of the new, a little of the old. Not just old.

People young, old and childless visit Disney World every single day. My wife and I have no children and even if we for some reason (will never happen, we cant wait to have kids) never had any we would still visit as many times as humanly possible.

PS: Sorry about the double post btw
 

disneyrcks

Well-Known Member
This is why America is one of the 'Largest' nations in the world ... because people gripe about having to walk roughly 1/4 mile or a 1/2 Kilometer ... seriously?!? That blows my mind. :lol:

Sorry maybe I wasn't clear enough....it is not a long walk as in too far...a long walk as in maybe something besides food and shopping would keep it a little more interesting.....that is what I meant. I have no problem walking at WDW.....I do have a problem with your snotty retort that has nothing to do with the OP's statement. I was making a suggestion that is relevant to the topic. I do not believe your judgemental (and incorrect) comment has a place in this thread. Maybe I wasn't clear with my original post but your response is pretty clear as to what kind of a person you are! I see you have been a member of this forum for quite some time....tell me what is it called when people make a rude comment towards others which has nothing to do with the topic being discussed? If you wish to continue discussing this in a mature way please feel free to PM me so we do not hijack this thread. Thank you.
 

Walt Disney1955

Well-Known Member
Haha! I totally get your point, but I don't think an attraction would exactly be a good idea for that franchise. After all, the Titanic was a real event and people did actually die tragic deaths on it. It would be kind of difficult to find someone who would be interested in making light of a historical tragedy in an amusement park ride. But I get what you are saying...

I was thinking that the movie would be implemented in the ride. Something along the lines of Spiderman at Universal. Can you imagine a 3-D ride with Titanic? I can't believe someone hadn't picked up the rights to that yet.

By the way, there is a wonderful attraction in Orlando down International Drive called "The Titanic Experience" which I am sure you and others are aware about. I wouldn't say they don't take what happened seriously, because they do, but the tour guide is always in character and there is a fun element to the attraction. It can be done at Disney for sure
 

Walt Disney1955

Well-Known Member
People young, old and childless visit Disney World every single day. My wife and I have no children and even if we for some reason (will never happen, we cant wait to have kids) never had any we would still visit as many times as humanly possible.

I agree with you totally. It is nearly impossible to tell a skeptical adult who has never been there this story though. They always fall back on the commercials they see on TV or Mickey Mouse, or Dumbo or stuff like that. They have no clue that an 80 year old can enjoy the place just as much
 

Katherine

Well-Known Member
To put it simply -- DHS (at the TIme Disney MGM Studios) was a rushed project from the onset and the entire idea was to open a movie-themed park at WDW before Universal Studios opened up the road. It had nothing to do with "disney magic" or "wanting a third park", or anything else. It had to do with straight-forward go for the bucks money grabbing, and it has had that problem through the years to today...

Actually this idea was developed from EPCOT. They originally were going to make a "how the movies are made" pavilion but discovered it was enough to turn into a park.

Attractions are added because they work on the west coast (ToT) or because they are cool and cheap to import from other parks where they are already proven crowd pleasers (Lights Cameras Action stunt show), etc.

ToT at DHS opened before the one at DCA... so it's actually the reverse and the Florida version has more features than the DCA version (probably because of budget). LMA looks really cool and I like that they brought in a "how moves are made" show since that's what the park is suppose to be.

Be thankful they have what they have. Had you gone to the park when it first opened (like many of us did), you'll know there was next to NOTHING to do in the park for the first few seasons.

That's because when it opened it was MEANT to be a half day park. I believe the plan was you would go there then go to a water park in the afternoon since Typhoon Lagoon opened the same year.


What DHS does have, though, that most people don't even pay attention to, are VERY accurate City of LA references -- from the street names, to the store names, to design of the signs, shape of the letters on windows, etc. Of course, scenic design does bubkus for those who are just running from ride to ride.

I think this is what makes this park amazing. I was always a run-to-the-ride person but this past trip I looked around more and it was really cool. I'm not a big thrill ride person so this park isn't necessarily my favorite for rides but I love the theming and could wander around for a long time just seeing things.

I agree though, it could use a BIG sprucing. I wish they would do more with the Animation Courtyard that had more to do with animation and not just playhouse disney or shows. I miss what that tour use to be. I also would love it if they updated their shows and utilize the "blessing of size". There is so much that can be done... maybe after FLE they will consider it, but I'd rather see Beastly Kingdom happen first (even though I don't know if that would ever happen...)
 

RonAnnArbor

Well-Known Member
Actually this idea was developed from EPCOT. They originally were going to make a "how the movies are made" pavilion but discovered it was enough to turn into a park.

That's Disney speak...that is NOT why the park was developed. Universal studios was seen as a direct threat to any dollars Disney might make in Orlando, and DHS was rushed into existence to directly compete with Universal and beat them to the punch.

See "Disney Wars" or "Realityland" -- both books, in addition to many others that are not Disney-written document it pretty clearly with timelines.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom