JEANYLASER
Well-Known Member
:sohappy:
Agreed, I dont think they know what to do with the space really, and they dont want to spend a dime obviously. Aside though from international vistors is merch really going to be that big a seller here? I see why it sells tons in california but here?
The false lasers are laughable, but that does show the extent of the original in theatre effects, most of which will be missing when the show returns.There is a sample of some of the original effects. Easily done these days.
The false lasers are laughable, but that does show the extent of the original in theatre effects, most of which will be missing when the show returns.
Indeed. Cheap route once again. The biggest complaint from Disneyland was the lack of 1986 physical effects and the bouncing floor trying to make up for it.but if they did it right the effects could return, but then there is that whole plussing thing they could go with...but yeah they don't do that anymore. They change or let go.
there are some easily done laser prisims and starfield effects done today for cheap cost. With the two months they are implementing this show they could do it.
Maybe.... :animwink:Martin, can I smell your ultimate tribute to HISTA being released?![]()
Yep, this is what I've thought all along. Why bring back something 20 years old in a park dedicated to the future??? Disney is just trying to make a quick, easy buck. Too bad they were too slow to capitalize on death. This would have netted way more cash had they made the move sooner after MJ's death.Yawn... HISTA, EO. Get rid of both, time for something new already...
I'm extremely happy that this film is being closed, it showed it's sign of age when the year 2010 rolled in and we realized that the 90's pop-culture has to go. I really wish that they would just get rid of it for good :-/
Hmm, how can I properly express my feelings about the existence/non-existence of HISTA and Captain EO? Ah yes.....:snore:
Right now, they are preparing to close HISTA on May 10. Last week it was going to be May 2. They have decided to upgrade the audio system and that is about it, they don't want to change it much because they will have to change it back again to HISTA after EO has had it's run of a year or so.
It sounds like the other parks are going all out with the special effects and make they will have good shows, but TDO wants to get by on the cheap. So it sounds like HISTA will be around for another 2-3 years, at least at Epcot.
Why bring back something 20 years old in a park dedicated to the future???
I think the error in this judgement is that Epcot, and EPCOT Center, has never been about the future per say. They were about progress, about the past, present, and future.
Every attraction up till Wonders of Life had this vision of presentationalism (call out to Passport to Dreams.) The rides were stories of us, our relation of the past and present to our future. SSE was about the progress of human communication and ideas and how this will shape the future. World of Motion, Living Seas, Listen to the Land, Horizons, Universe of Energy, they were all about this. Now every pavilion seems to have a backstory and some sort of history or organization behind it, with the noteable exception of The Land and SSE.
With one notable, and somewhat ironic in this discussion, exception, Imagination, which was supposed to be timeless and tie together the idea that our future comes from one little spark.
Future World has always been somewhat of an odd term to name that side of the park that so strongly features history. It wasn't until Innoventions and Mission:Space did we see a strong case for the future, to the point where M:S even takes place 20 years from now.
I would have to disagree with you. Horizons was all about the future, it didn't have a past. Even in the queue line, they talked about the future and it was called FuturePort. They showed technological advances in the Future and had 3 different adventures into future destinations.
I counter your move with a youtube video! :lol:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbuA4m4QZQY
Minute mark 1:25 to 4:40.
Even though it dealt with "the future", it was the history of "the future." Here it isn't future time, but the historical, and nostalgic look at the future and what it said about those time periods. From the idea of having a giant cannon shoot a man in a bullet to the moon, to a neon metropolis, it's the history of "the future." The narration even references looking back at people "dreaming about the future for centuries", then showing current advances in technology, before heading into space colonies and undersea hotels. Granted, Horizons was weighted more towards the future than World of Motion, which had one giant room and a HM effect, but it still followed this general formula.
So are saying even though Horizons was talking all the about the future and not the past. It didn't belong in Future World? When Future World opened it was all about the future of Communications, Transportation, Agriculture, Oceanography, and Energy. Horizons combined them all and showed man's relationship with the future.
The big problem was they didn't keep it updated with the future, so technology caught up to them.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.