Inspired Figment
Well-Known Member
BingoA lot of those attraction changes were likely directives from above (Snow White, for instance) and to say that Big Bad Kim Irvine ruined all of them seems incorrect.
BingoA lot of those attraction changes were likely directives from above (Snow White, for instance) and to say that Big Bad Kim Irvine ruined all of them seems incorrect.
This is not a quick ad by the guys who run a local haunt. It is a promotion piece produced by a multibillion dollar multinational entertainment conglomerate for one of their marquee attractions at their flagship park that generates millions of dollars in revenue in a single day. It went through copious hours of review and approval before being posted. It is absolutely “legit”.I understand that.. at the same time though.. it’s not supposed to be a legit voice over per say. Just something done in fun while still speaking about the enhancements as her usual self. I wouldn’t be so harsh on her in all honesty.
Yeah, the fencing was really the only oddity...wasn't sure what the purpose was.
You can tell. It seems she feels she's going to "retire" soon and is imprinting her style on all the icons, usually not for the better.also she’s been doing this imagineering thing since 1970)
This is true - MANY times Kim has gone to bat with them in an effort to resist or mitigate their negative influence on the park. She then is tasked with delivering on the compromise she was able to negotiate and often gets raked over the coals by fans who don’t realize the result is the best possible version of someone else’s bad idea.A lot of those attraction changes were likely directives from above (Snow White, for instance) and to say that Big Bad Kim Irvine ruined all of them seems incorrect.
I hope it's to separate the lighting and make the actual load area seem darker.
100% agree. Everyone is a corporate employee. The Imagineers should be glad to be working at the pleasure of Management. They are all under different kinds of pressure.The most tired argument on any Disney board: If you like the project it is because the Imagineer is brilliant. If the project sucks, it's because of management, "bean counters", Eisner/Bob, etc.
How come we never hear "Wow, have you seen Splash Mountain?! Wow, that was great of Eisner to greenlight it and the CFO to fund the CAPEX!!! So glad all of the upper management was so involved and pumped so much money into it so it could be amazing!!!"
Nope, it's "Splash is great because of Tony Baxter" and Batuu sucks because of "someone at corporate".
Rinse. Repeat.
I think they just meant that it’s more a general interview with a project director that was given a spirited slant to fit the vibe of the ride being talked about than it is a genuine effort at creating a Mansion-ready brand element, you know? Like that video of the Snow White updates where she’s just a talking head over clips of the new elements. It’s intended to be “cute”, light marketing, not an in-park product, which would of course be held to a higher standard. It’s a social media peek behind the scenes, not a full-blown national commercial.This is not a quick ad by the guys who run a local haunt. It is a promotion piece produced by a multibillion dollar multinational entertainment conglomerate for one of their marquee attractions at their flagship park that generates millions of dollars in revenue in a single day. It went through copious hours of review and approval before being posted. It is absolutely “legit”.
Yeah, the fencing was really the only oddity...wasn't sure what the purpose was.
I hope it's to separate the lighting and make the actual load area seem darker.
Truth be told, that‘s not exactly the best example simply because Michael Eisner’s greenlighting of Splash Mountain is famously used as an example of his spirited shakeup of the company from one that was growing creatively stagnant to one that was willing to take risks. He greenlit Splash and Star Tours in the same day because he brought his kid to the model shop and those were the projects that blew the kid’s mind, so he figured the public would probably flip for them too.The most tired argument on any Disney board: If you like the project it is because the Imagineer is brilliant. If the project sucks, it's because of management, "bean counters", Eisner/Bob, etc.
How come we never hear "Wow, have you seen Splash Mountain?! Wow, that was great of Eisner to greenlight it and the CFO to fund the CAPEX!!! So glad all of the upper management was so involved and pumped so much money into it so it could be amazing!!!"
Nope, it's "Splash is great because of Tony Baxter" and Batuu sucks because of "someone at corporate".
Rinse. Repeat.
I don’t blame Kim but lets not pretend that these videos aren’t productions. Disney isn’t just letting people put something together to share. There is no reason that Disney can not have better writing and performances. They have the resources to make this pieces better. And it’s not just these design videos. Go watch Chapek speaking at IAAPA and he’s about as charismatic as a bag of bricks. There’s no reason public facing executives can‘t have some coaching.I think they just meant that it’s more a general interview with a project director that was given a spirited slant to fit the vibe of the ride being talked about than it is a genuine effort at creating a Mansion-ready brand element, you know? Like that video of the Snow White updates where she’s just a talking head over clips of the new elements. It’s intended to be “cute”, light marketing, not an in-park product, which would of course be held to a higher standard. It’s a social media peek behind the scenes, not a full-blown national commercial.
That said, I do think there’s room for improvement in the Imagineering social media realm - too many videos over the years show frightened-looking Imagineers talking about projects they maybe we’re HEAD of but clearly have no business being the FACE of. And even beyond that, check the videos Disney Parks has been uploading to Tiktok - whoever’s doing their voiceover sounds like they would kill to be anywhere else. It’s frankly quite puzzling considering how many people there are out there who could easily do better and probably for less.
All this to say, I don’t really blame Kim for not being a stellar voice over artist, I blame whoever keeps asking people who aren’t to try to pretend to be.
I wonder if there is a functional reason for it. Something do with the lighting or the April portrait?
Actually it may just be to continue the illusion of being in a hallway which isn’t really working.
Like I said, she’s not perfect - and perhaps in the case of the Auction calling it the “best possible version of the idea” is overly generous. I’m not a fan of how it turned out. My point was mainly that without someone like Kim Irvine stepping up and insisting something of quality be done elsewhere in the attraction we would have ONLY gotten a terrible redo of a classic scene and been left to settle for that.Interesting. So who in corporate Strat Planning or Finance wrote the dialogue about the chickens?
I wonder who in Investor Relations came up with the idea to have pirates (who are simultaneously looting, burning down a town, and drowning its mayor) participating in an episode of Antique Road Show?
That’s basically what I said - I don’t expect everything to be done at the same level, and a little Tiktok video is hardly hard-hitting news, but the platform has literally thousands of fans brimming with enthusiasm who could host those things a thousand times better than whoever’s doing it now. It puzzles me that Disney doesn’t just pluck a couple of them from obscurity and take the quality to the next level for practically nothing.I don’t blame Kim but lets not pretend that these videos aren’t productions. Disney isn’t just letting people put something together to share. There is no reason that Disney can not have better writing and performances. They have the resources to make this pieces better. And it’s not just these design videos. Go watch Chapek speaking at IAAPA and he’s about as charismatic as a bag of bricks. There’s no reason public facing executives can‘t have some coaching.
The OC Register article indicates it’s meant to mask off the greater Load Area a bit to encourage your attention towards April December.Social distance barrier
In addition to the lighting balance that may or may not be an issue, the placement of the new portrait seems like it could cause some issues.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.