Just out of curiosity then, how many non-disney fanatics do you know that go to Disney every year? Every other year? Every three years? How many of those people are also now planning to go to Universal because of Harry Potter? How many of those people might go to Universal when Harry Potter is in both gates? You can say what you like, but Harry affected Disney's bottom line. Disney will always (well most likely) be the #1 player in Central Florida. However, Disney got accustomed to being the sole destination for a long time, with Universal only being a thought to some people that ventured that way. Now, Universal is getting attention because they built something good. Outside of Disney loyal forums, I have heard nothing but glowing reviews of how great WWoHP is (with crowds being the sole thing people have complained about to me). In regards to Harry, I don't really listen to much on these and like-minded forums. We, for the most part, are biased in our thinking. We love Disney, and most of us want to see them succeed and be #1 always. However, whether we want to accept it or not, Harry has taken market share from Disney. It's immersive, it's got a ground breaking attraction, and it is unique. The rumored new area is going to be more of that as well, and will continue to eat into Disney's marketshare. What used to be a week in WDW for someone, might only be 4 or 5 days now. That is a considerable amount of revenue to lose. If Disney wants to compete effectively against that, then they are going to have to look away from promoting the same things over and over again. The bus can only tell you that "Nemo and Friends" is a new experience for so long before people get tired with it. Like I said, nostalgia works at first, it isn't sustainable forever.