Guest walking on Cinderella Castle’s Balcony

[HoldenC]

Wow, you come across a little angry with life, settle down

Yes I am angry when people defend the actions of fools. But anything to make Disney look like the bad guy is a go on here lately.

 

[peter11435]

Assume much, why is doubtful they have been there?

Really?

The vast majority of people have not visited more than one Disney resort. That’s not an assumption.

To claim that the person who opened the gate possibly did so because they were familiar with it being allowed in Tokyo is a huge assumption

 

[draybook]

Aparently people still like jumping off cliffs..

Only if my friends are doing it...

 

[Tom Morrow]

I wasn't mad on my post, that was not an attack on disney lol.

I'm just wondering why Disney needs to "step it up" in regards to this.

 

[Dave B]

Really?

The vast majority of people have not visited more than one Disney resort. That’s not an assumption.

To claim that the person who opened the gate possibly did so because they were familiar with it being allowed in Tokyo is a huge assumption

A vast majority of visitors come from over seas, I have a hard time believing they have never been to another Disney park, again a lot of assumptions

 

[Dave B]

Yes I am angry when people defend the actions of fools. But anything to make Disney look like the bad guy is a go on here lately.

So, why are they fools? For trying to look at the castle?

 

[HoldenC]

So, why are they fools? For trying to look at the castle?

For disobeying the rules.

 

[Dave B]

For disobeying the rules.

so how would they know the are disobeying the rules, especially if they followed someone up there

 

[King Racoon 77]

I agree. The less idiots in the park, the better. Of course I'm sure Disney apologized and gave them FastPassess for the stupidity. Hint if you are dumb enough to think it's allow to walk on the freaking castle you're too stupid to be in the park.

I wonder if those guests know the difference between "it's allow" and "it's allowed"

 

[HoldenC]

I wonder if those guests know the difference between "it's allow" and "it's allowed"

Many people have better grammar than me, so likely yes!

 

[peter11435]

A vast majority of visitors come from over seas, I have a hard time believing they have never been to another Disney park, again a lot of assumptions

A large number of guests come from over seas but it’s not a “majority.”

I’m not assuming anything. I said it was unlikely and it is.

 

[peter11435]

by your stance, they have never been to another park, just Disney World, so how would they know the are disobeying the rules, especially if they followed someone up there

There’s a gate with a sign

 

[Animaniac93-98]

Looks to be in need of a serious refurb and repaint. The missing gold turret topper on the left when looking from the front has been bothering me for two years now.

Constantly spraying it with water (even in the winter) doesn’t help.

 

[BMoo]

That is possibly more operational choice. Given that it is a large balcony, it seems doubtful that it is only legally designated as an exit corridor.

Egress areas must still comply to code and there are also related OSHA requirements. A guard only needs to be a minimum of 3’-6” and these don’t look too short.

He's right, I suspect the true reason that it is not accessible is due to egress paths. That stair serves as the only exit from the patio (going back into the building wouldn't be allowed as a form of egress). With only one exit in an assembly space, you are not allowed to exceed 49 occupants. Unless a CM was permanently stationed at the bottom of the stairs with a tally counter, they would have no way to enforce that code requirement for public access. And even then, you'd have to control access from both the stair and the restaurant.

 

[ParkPeeker]

AdamTheWoo was there? /sarcasm

I know who that is but I don't watch him, so I don't get the joke sadly

I'm just wondering why Disney needs to "step it up" in regards to this.

I should have been more direct. When I said Disney needs to step it up, it was me saying this is management's fault, not the guests. I was trying to imply that.

but I guess it looks more like 'disney is such trash' on here

 

[ParkPeeker]

Um why the heck was my reply removed?

 

[Dave B]

you must have been nasty?

 

[ParkPeeker]

you must have been nasty?

this was the very first post, before the several edits which also didn't make the cut. I think I was just as nasty as the dude who replied to my first post (annoyance/not too nasty come on)

 

[The Mom]

You kept posting the same thing several times - despite the "waiting for moderator approval" message. So, I approved one, and the others were deleted. If you hadn't kept posting there would only have been one post to approve - the first one.

 

[ParkPeeker]

You kept posting the same thing several times - despite the "waiting for moderator approval" message. So, I approved one, and the others were deleted. If you hadn't kept posting there would only have been one post to approve - the first one.

yea my mistake, I assumed it was removed since it was crossed out on my profile latest posts/activity thing, and in frustration kept trying to post it without the mod notification happening