George Lucas on a Bench
Well-Known Member
They're gonna change it to the monkey version?
If this turns out to be true, which I pray it does, it certainly appears that Disney does consider Mission Breakout a failure. If it does prove to be true, however, I'm only going to be even more ticked that we got this awful attraction instead of keeping Tower of Terror just stripped of any TTZ references like Paris allegedly will have.
https://wdwn t.com/2018/02/tower-of-terror-renovation-mission-breakout/
I would assume they won't convert in Paris mostly due to cost.
I do believe Disney has publicly stated they consider GOTG a huge success... with high guest ratings and they attributed attendance increases at DCA to it on the financial update.
Obviously who knows what they think behind closed doors... I would assume they won't convert in Paris mostly due to cost.
Obviously who knows what they think behind closed doors... I would assume they won't convert in Paris mostly due to cost.
Well publicly of course they ll say it’s a success. But I remember our very own @GiveMeTheMusic said that Disney was disappointed with the attraction and the parks attendance numbers the summer after It opened last year.
With that said, I do agree that it’s probably not being converted to Marvel because of cost (or a change in direction... probably because of cost) and not because they view GOTG as a failure.
Animal Kingdom had attendance gains, too, but they're still calling Avatar land a failure because it didn't meet expectations.But I mean they literally just said DCA had attendance gains which they attribute to GOTG? Would they lie to investors? And that's a genuine question, I have no idea.
Well publicly of course they ll say it’s a success. But I remember our very own @GiveMeTheMusic said that Disney was disappointed with the attraction and the parks attendance numbers the summer after It opened last year.
With that said, I do agree that it’s probably not being converted to Marvel because of cost (or a change in direction... probably because of cost) and not because they view GOTG as a failure.
Animal Kingdom had attendance gains, too, but they're still calling Avatar land a failure because it didn't meet expectations.
But I mean they literally just said DCA had attendance gains which they attribute to GOTG? Would they lie to investors? And that's a genuine question, I have no idea.
This is opposite of what was reported to investors in the last quarterly report which stated that because of mission break out attendance saw an increase in Anaheim.
Avatar is the highest grossing film of all time and Disney expected the land to destroy Potter in popularity. It did not.Who's calling it a failure? First i've heard of Pandora being a failure.
Avatar is the highest grossing film of all time and Disney expected the land to destroy Potter in popularity. It did not.
I don't think they ever thought it would destroy Potter? Did anyone believe that would happen? But I do think Disney sees it as a success, they've sold crazy numbers of Banshee's, AK had attendance increases, and the lands packed.
But has it increased attendance by 50%? That’s the sort of gains it would need to drive in order to beat non-franchise Expedition Everest in terms of dollars per guest.I don't think there was ever a possibility it wouldn't increase attendance at AK...
For what it's worth.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.