Vegas Disney Fan
Well-Known Member
I've always boiled down the problems with C&H to:
There are some things they could've done to mitigate this, especially #2. For example, the "Diggs County" sign could've been much larger and read something like: "welcome to our small town where big fossils were discovered and The Dino Institute was founded." Boom. Now everything makes sense.
- While it's thematically good (in terms of properly representing a roadside carnival), it's aesthetically bad. Unlike the "visual rhyming" and other design principles that are carefully followed throughout the rest of DAK - making it one of Disney's most beautiful parks - C&H simply isn't beautiful.
- The premise of a Disney environment is supposed to make sense immediately, even if it requires time and attention to understand in more depth. With C&H, most regular guests will not understand that it's "themed to be an un-themed amusement park." They just see an un-themed amusement park. This breaks the park's transportive "spell" and blurs the line between Disney and the "real world."
I think it’s as simple as a bad theme is a bad theme no matter how well it’s done.
Universal Studios, Hollywood Studios, Walt Disney Studio Park at DLP… all look(ed) just like backlots but since that’s a horrible theme it doesn’t matter how accurate they look, they still look horrible, it’s also telling all three are slowly transitioning away from “soundstages” because its a universally loathed theme in the theme park community.
C&H is the same, it could be the best done “roadside“ carnival in the world but it would still be a horrible theme.
It’s pretty obvious when Disney picks a theme because they think they can build something amazing with it (Galaxy’s Edge, Pandora, Carsland, etc) and when they pick a theme because it allows them to build something cheap (C&H, soundstages, DCA boardwalk, etc).