Sir_Cliff
Well-Known Member
My honest impression is that this could have cost a third of the price and it wouldn't have made much of a difference on their decisions about other projects. Would cutting a few hundred million off this budget really have resulted in a new WS pavilion, Coco in Mexico, the festival center, or a new JII, for example? These projects all seem to live or die on whatever Disney judges are their own merits and I doubt they would have splashed around more cash had a new rollercoaster opened to great success that cost $150million than they will end up doing once this one that cost $450million opens to great success. The same dynamic regarding whether they "fixed" the park based on its popularity would still be there.I agree with your reasons…
But mine is that this will exasperate a park that still is lagging on reinvestment. And that they won’t really touch it because they will claim they “totally reinvested” in it.
That’s a problem. We’re in an aborted redevelopment plan there and it needs a lot more love. The WOL redo will help…obviously another country or two being revamped would help…the eyesore behind the jumping fountains would help too.
Just not there yet and time makes that worse.
Where I do think the cost is relevant is that everything WDI does these days is insanely expensive. That's a broader issue than this one attraction, though the attraction is certainly a symptom of that problem.