TalkingHead
Well-Known Member
Why do you care? You're not going to like either anyways, right?
Huh?
Why do you care? You're not going to like either anyways, right?
About TDS, I'm convinced that's what happens when you take a stupid amount of money, give it to Imagineering, and say "Make whatever you want. Just make it GOOD" without worrying about IP1 and IP2 or investors. Man, I want that to happen in a US park.Oh, I absolutely agree that each park (in a resort) needs to be distinct and to have some defining characteristics that distinguish them. I'm not in any way arguing against that and there is a real and legit concern about the various WDW parks becoming somewhat homogenized. I'm just saying that I don't think you need to have an individual park have to have some overarching theme that has to be slavishly referred to by each land.
TDS has a distinguishing concept binding everything together (sea/water) but fundamentally it's set up in a very similar fashion to TDL and other castle parks. What it does, however, is present new and different themes for lands than TDL and executes them (mostly) brilliantly. As I said, I think having individual lands that are individually cohesive and high quality is more important IMHO than having a park concept that everything has to adhere to.
Have you ridden it?It is. What's the difference?
Back on topic, when is Guardians expected to open? Before or after Star Wars?
I agree but there's also a very easy counterpoint to make:Okay, I was going to write this up later. But with all due respect, I experienced seven anxiety attacks while reading your post. So here's what I say. And I'd love to hear if and how you/others disagree.
-----
Fifty years ago, the idea of spending a week at theme/amusement parks was completely foreign. "Why would anyone want to do that... wouldn't that be too much of the same thing?" they'd say. Disneyland was built with the intention of being a day-trip (or one night) place, just like any amusement park or carnival. Magic Kingdom was also built with the intention of being one park in a resort of other things (like a city of tomorrow).
When Disney decided to add more parks to WDW, they had to sell people on the idea of a theme park vacation. So they made each park fundamentally different.
It's fine to have one Magic-Kingdom-like park, but two? Three? Four? Think about how terrible UO would be with Universal Studios Florida, Islands of Adventure, Peninsulas of More Adventure, and Plateaus of Epic Adventure. I already can't tell the difference between the two parks... four of them would feel rediculous, confusing, and probably unappealing to the general public.
Today, the theme park vacation is so ingrained in our culture that things won't change overnight. But if guests begin to feel that it's too much of the same thing, they could begin to spend less time or fewer vacations in Orlando. Or at DL. Or at any place that wants you to go to more than one park. As someone who has no interest in seeing the downfall of the theme park resort, I really think each park needs to be fundamentally different.
That is very true. My biggest issue with MK is really character interaction. It seems everything is so processed where in DL it seems it's more on the fly. Sort of "here wait in this 30 minute line to see X" vs "oh hey X is out walking around, I'll try to get a picture". I can't remember the last time I've seen a character jump on a ride with a kid at MK. There seems to be a lot less "aw that's nice" moments at MK vs DL. But MK (1 day) and AK (maybe the whole morning) are the 2 parks I barely spend any time in. DCA seems like it's in a good spot aside from the tower. The state of Epcot just straight bums me out. It could be so much more. And I don't mind 2 parks vs 4. I've been to WDW 25+ times (once a year with some double visits in a year) and I want a change of scenery. Plus I want to ride a Space Mountain that's been cared for and given love, as stupid as that sounds.
I'm hoping some of the AAs may be put in storage for an overhaul and future use elsewhere. Aside from that it's looking like a full gutting beyond the preshow room sadly. As it stands, both ride systems need a lot of money pumping into them. GMR as we know also needs an artistic overhaul. Many of the Energy show components are life expired. The company has deemed its not worth it to fix them.If I had to guess, 90% of it is getting dumped? Probably a couple AA's being saved but the rest being scrapped/repurposed.
What gets me with all of this, they must've really wanted this ride system GONE. To close GMR and UoE on the same exact days sends a strange feeling out. Which is sad because it was a truly unique ride system that could move a metric crap-ton (official term) of people in one go.
Are you going to be there to document the last days?
I'm hoping some of the AAs may be put in storage for an overhaul and future use elsewhere. Aside from that it's looking like a full gutting beyond the preshow room sadly. As it stands, both ride systems need a lot of money pumping into them. GMR as we know also needs an artistic overhaul. Many of the Energy show components are life expired. The company has deemed its not worth it to fix them.
Energy has been documented in huge detail since December for me. I won't be there when it closes. The pavilion holds a lot of personal memories for me. It was the first EPCOT Center attraction I rode in 1987 and had a huge impact on me. Bitter sweet.
Which probably stems from the low ridership and needing a decent upgrade for something that might not have a guaranteed draw after a lot of money is spent. It's like they took the safe and lazy route by cramming an IP in there. I guess I'm glad the building mostly survives even if it's going to be gutted.I'm hoping some of the AAs may be put in storage for an overhaul and future use elsewhere. Aside from that it's looking like a full gutting beyond the preshow room sadly. As it stands, both ride systems need a lot of money pumping into them. GMR as we know also needs an artistic overhaul. Many of the Energy show components are life expired. The company has deemed its not worth it to fix them.
Energy has been documented in huge detail since December for me. I won't be there when it closes. The pavilion holds a lot of personal memories for me. It was the first EPCOT Center attraction I rode in 1987 and had a huge impact on me. Bitter sweet.
I'm hoping some of the AAs may be put in storage for an overhaul and future use elsewhere. Aside from that it's looking like a full gutting beyond the preshow room sadly. As it stands, both ride systems need a lot of money pumping into them. GMR as we know also needs an artistic overhaul. Many of the Energy show components are life expired. The company has deemed its not worth it to fix them.
Energy has been documented in huge detail since December for me. I won't be there when it closes. The pavilion holds a lot of personal memories for me. It was the first EPCOT Center attraction I rode in 1987 and had a huge impact on me. Bitter sweet.
We're lucky to be able to spend three weeks in Central Florida each year. Though I have a lot of friends around Orlando to help me out with things when I`m not there.Just out of curiosity Martin, how often do you make over here to see the parks?
I'm hoping some of the AAs may be put in storage for an overhaul and future use elsewhere. Aside from that it's looking like a full gutting beyond the preshow room sadly. As it stands, both ride systems need a lot of money pumping into them. GMR as we know also needs an artistic overhaul. Many of the Energy show components are life expired. The company has deemed its not worth it to fix them.
Energy has been documented in huge detail since December for me. I won't be there when it closes. The pavilion holds a lot of personal memories for me. It was the first EPCOT Center attraction I rode in 1987 and had a huge impact on me. Bitter sweet.
Have you ridden it?
I agree but there's also a very easy counterpoint to make:
The difference between the parks are the attractions they have, obviously.
I really wish I could've seen the original. The music for the ride was great, especially the exit track:In 87 it was really nice. Loved the Radok blocks. The finale was actually grand and epic. I was 17 at the time. Height of my EPCOT visiting. I worked two jobs (movie theatre concessionist and mowing lawns which is essentially full time in Florida) and some of my money always went toward the "three season salute" pass for Floridians. In January, May, and September I was in MK or EPCOT with about twice as much time spent in EPCOT. I mean I was there almost every free moment. During the other 9 months I (and my friends) spent a fair bit of time dorking around the Contemporary and Poly arcades/pools. Don't tell anyone on the boards though. Those behaviors are frowned upon.
I'd love to have the dinosaurs re-purposed as background dinosaurs for the dinosaur zoo that would make Dinoland USA pretty top notch. But, I'm sure that is just silly daydreaming.
If anything DHS is starting to feel more like Universal Studios than Magic Kingdom while Animal Kingdom still retains its nature focused identity. Epcot is strange. The rides are changing but the look of the park itself is still radically different from anything else. It's one of my favorite places just to walk around.Well of course. But if every park feels like another Magic Kingdom... guests will get tired, I suspect.
Sorry, if this has been discussed already. However, do we know what type of ride Guardians is going to be? I haven't been on this thread in a while and I have not had the chance to read through what I missed. I know earlier t was said to be a coaster. I haven't heard any more on this front.
That's what I thought. Thank you!That's basically all that has been said about it. Just a coaster with some interesting show elements.
Current management LOVES to take any opportunity to make a fast buck, especially on something closing. Did it with TOT in DCA. They're doing it with this, and GMR. They know they're annoying people by shutting these doors, and this is their way to say "sorry...but at least you can get some exclusive new merch on the way out!"So this is a thing
View attachment 220584
View attachment 220585
Shirt is $30, hat is $25. There's also passholder merch of a slightly different shirt and an ornament ($15). Being sold inside the exit to UoE and one of the stalls on the bridge to World Showcase. They're using Hanes as the base for the shirts.
At least UoE is getting merch but I didn't expect it to be this sad. Hat is alright though.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.