GlacierGlacier
Well-Known Member
in the Biiiig bluuuuue booooox
in the Biiiig bluuuuue booooox
This is a great example of the garbage comments that makes this forum almost unbearable these days. Whatever it takes for those "likes" I guess.
No. Absolutely not. I’d go in there looking JUST for reports of each guest death in the gondolas and be forced to wade through pages of complaints about complaints.Maybe there should be a merged thread titled "Big Blue Box & Gondola death carts" - put your comments in that.
Out of all the over the top moaning and complaining in this thread you picked out that quote?This is a great example of the garbage comments that makes this forum almost unbearable these days. Whatever it takes for those "likes" I guess.
No. Absolutely not. I’d go in there looking JUST for reports of each guest death in the gondolas and be forced to wade through pages of complaints about complaints.
I am actually pretty big fan of humor. I just prefer intelligent humor instead of sycophantic dog-piling. It just gets old here.It was all in good fun, Mr. Krabs. If you can’t handle some levity from time to time, I suggest frequenting a different site where it’s not allowed. Or use the Ignore button.
And I don’t need “likes”. I’m not 12, or a millennial.
I agree that it’s unlikely that they would decorate the gravity building. They’re clearly committed to a “camouflage“ approach with those prefinished panels. But your reasoning doesn’t make sense to me. Why would it require a “significant addition and reworking?” We’ve seen every stage of construction so far—we know there’s a solid frame under the exterior. Lightweight perforated cladding could be attached to exactly the same supports as the light blue panels. If backlit, this would approximate the look of the building in the illustration. Why do you keep saying it wouldn’t be possible?Doing it would require significant addition and reworking of the building. It wouldn’t just be something we haven’t seen yet, it would be an entirely new structure added onto an existing structure requiring rework of what has just been done. It would be a literal addition to the building.
Eh, I like the critical dialog. It’s the competition to make the most hyperbolic anti-Disney statements that is just annoying and difficult to avoid. This place is slowly becoming an echo chamber of negative rhetoric.Out of all the over the top moaning and complaining in this thread you picked out that quote?
I don't know that it even needs to be anything this elaborate, but the place is the Experimental Prototype COMMUNITY OF TOMORROW Can't they make "some" effort to make this building, and the Soarin' building, look somewhat futuristic? How hard would it really be to make them look like some kind of "Future World" structures on the edge of this Community of Tomorrow?As others have said, virtually zero possibility, though I was a fan of that path over the blue boxView attachment 352847
I'm not a millennial either, but damn, I had to like this!It was all in good fun, Mr. Krabs. If you can’t handle some levity from time to time, I suggest frequenting a different site where it’s not allowed. Or use the Ignore button.
And I don’t need “likes”. I’m not 12, or a millennial.
There is not a solid frame behind the exterior walls. They are held up by girts which are a light system that are not intended for much weight. The thickness of the exterior walls is almost all foam, with thin sheets of metal sandwiching it. Perforated metal panel systems require a more substantial wall assembly like steel studs, which would be vertically oriented and no more than 2’ from each other while the girts run horizontally and are at least 4’ apart. So even perforated metal panels would require building another wall somewhere to hold them up, making the existing walls pointless.I agree that it’s unlikely that they would decorate the gravity building. They’re clearly committed to a “camouflage“ approach with those prefinished panels. But your reasoning doesn’t make sense to me. Why would it require a “significant addition and reworking?” We’ve seen every stage of construction so far—we know there’s a solid frame under the exterior. Lightweight perforated cladding could be attached to exactly the same supports as the light blue panels. If backlit, this would approximate the look of the building in the illustration. Why do you keep saying it wouldn’t be possible?
Are people actually "moaning and complaining", or is it that they offer inconvenient information to those who simply do not want to hear it?Out of all the over the top moaning and complaining in this thread you picked out that quote?
When Disney's says this ride will be operational in "2021", do you think it will be Jan-May 2021 or June-Dec 2021?
I really want my next trip to include this ride, so hoping for the Jan-May timing.
Whatever "spring" would mean.
When Disney's says this ride will be operational in "2021", do you think it will be Jan-May 2021 or June-Dec 2021?
I really want my next trip to include this ride, so hoping for the Jan-May timing.
Currently before May.Whatever "spring" would mean.
Currently before May.
Now, can we get back to complaining about how EPCOT will never compare to the state in which it existed as seen through our childhood nostalgia-vision.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.