I was in Japan. I was looking at Japan. I didn't even notice the big box.Go stand at Japan and say that.
I was in Japan. I was looking at Japan. I didn't even notice the big box.Go stand at Japan and say that.
There is nothing wrong with the exterior of world of motion aside from poor upkeep/cleaning and the addition of structures from the current ride inside the building. If they built this building today it would still look appropriate for the future world theme. In fact the world of motion building as originally built would look appropriate on most Silicon Valley campuses built today, including Apple’s newest campus.
Edit: And why is the MK held to a different standard than Epcot?
1 that’s not true and 2 there is a big difference to a building built right on the edge of “the berm” and a building like the tower of terror or swan and dolphin towers.Well if you look at the renderings of what inspired the park we now call Epcot, there was no effort being given to insulating it from views of the outside world. To the contrary.
We're only tourists, after all.... an oblivious idiot who is treated as some sort of noble ideal. The entire concept of a theme park, storytelling through the subtleties of built space, can be dismissed as something people don’t notice or focus on or care about.
1 that’s not true and 2 there is a big difference to a building built right on the edge of “the berm” and a building like the tower of terror or swan and dolphin towers.
I’m not sure what you mean by elevated areas, but I know that this 130’ tall warehouse building would not have even been considered remotely acceptable based on the original design aesthetics and architecture of Epcot. But even by today’s standards it is surprising because of how visible it is and how they decided to go about cloaking it.Actually it is true. All the elevated areas have windows facing outward. Sort of the opposite of Disneyland. Pretty sure by design.
Well if you look at the renderings of what inspired the park we now call Epcot, there was no effort being given to insulating it from views of the outside world. To the contrary.
With the exception of the Swan, Dolphin and Tower of Terror, I can't think of anything from the "outside world" that can be seen from within Epcot. They even went to the extra effort to make Tower of Terror blend into Morocco.
Edit: And why is the MK held to a different standard than Epcot?
It's entirely conceivable that the characters from the movie are just living it up in Epcot and there's no grand inspirational message or view into burgeoning technologies. If this is a love letter to classic EPCOT I think people may accept that.I think it's not entirely outside of the realm of possibility for a pre-show where Rocket runs around Epcot stealing stuff (Buzzy, redressing the journey into imagination vehicles as the new vehicles, etc.). All as part of his "master plan".
I'm not sure if it's a good thing or not. But I really expect the ride will have some self-awareness of where it is, based on the other Marvel attractions so far.
I’m not sure what you mean by elevated areas, but I know that this 130’ tall warehouse building would not have even been considered remotely acceptable based on the original design aesthetics and architecture of Epcot. But even by today’s standards it is surprising because of how visible it is and how they decided to go about cloaking it.
Because MK and AK are designed to be closed spaces where you do not see thematic elements from other lands in the park let alone outside of it. Epcot and DHS from the beginning where not designed that way. Epcot is a permanent worlds fair, worlds fairs occurred in major cities or near to them, they never were closed off from the outside world. You could always see future world from world showcase, and look across the lagoon and see thematic irregularities.
As I said before, I have a bigger problem seeing the backside of Everest and Pandora from the parking lot as it ruins the illusion before you can even see it. I wish they would have increased the rock sculpting to hide it from the lot or used trees to hide them.
Disney has said Epcot was not designed in the same manner as a castle. While they have sought a similar aesthetic it is clear by the placement of the Swan and Dolphin that there is a different standard for Epcot.
By original inspiration I am referring to Walt's original plans. From many vantage points within this community you would have seen far more than warehouses, highways etc. well off property.
Like swamps, miles and miles of swamps.Disney has said Epcot was not designed in the same manner as a castle. While they have sought a similar aesthetic it is clear by the placement of the Swan and Dolphin that there is a different standard for Epcot.
By original inspiration I am referring to Walt's original plans. From many vantage points within this community you would have seen far more than warehouses, highways etc. well off property.
Are you upset about the Soarin building? It’s also an unthemed building.
Go stand at Japan and say that.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.