Horizons '83
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- No
It will be interesting to see how this turns out, I guess we have 43 months or so to discuss this haha
Yep! As to the thread, I did post above that Bill Nye the Science Guy is suing Disney. Didn't know he had a show in the 90s. Makes sense why he was in Ellen's Energy Adventure. Considering the suit, not surprised the Disney closed the attraction.
You didn't know he had a show back in the day? Man, I feel old.
Bill was THE man then. From kindergarten ('92 baby) to high school to even college, I still enjoy watching that show. The new one...no thanks.I lived in the DC area during that time so anything Disney wasn't on my Radar then. (Well, there was the Disney's America fiasco but that's a whole different thread and off topic.)
What's with all this RnRC bashing? It's a great ride, people!!!
Shanghai's Tomorrowland always felt too communist to me. That works in a park that's distinctly Chinese, but not sure how I'd feel about it in the Magic Kingdom.
Personally? Rat and Mickey will be fun rides. The runaway choo choo may have the edge. But I can't say that without saying (again) it's in the wrong place and built there for the wrong reasons.@marni1971, location aside, what do you think will be the best attraction from D23 that is slated to be built?
So Guardians in your opinion is currently below Rat? Obviously having a ride tied to the land is ideal and adds to the experience, but I was hoping it would pull a Splash.Personally? Rat and Mickey will be fun rides. The runaway choo choo may have the edge. But I can't say that without saying (again) it's in the wrong place and built there for the wrong reasons.
IMHO yes. Personally I'm more excited for TRON than Infinite Universe and that's saying something.So Guardians in your opinion is currently below Rat?
Dang. Well, I suppose it’s better knowing that than waiting years to only have your expectations set too high. As always thanks Martin!IMHO yes. Personally I'm more excited for TRON and that's saying something.
I think it'll be subjective and down to personal preference. For that I'll stay none commital. But I was spoilt and did ride Mission One in Paris.Ignoring Guardians and ignoring it's placement, how will the ride itself stack up, on it's own, ignoring those two things? Is it going to be THAT disappointing?
Not to continue badgering you, but is this project worth the money? I.E. are we looking at New Fantasyland and Toy Story or Star Wars and Pandora? Obviously that's subjective, but I guess my question is do you think people will come off saying, "Wow, that was great", or "That was it?"I think it'll be subjective and down to personal preference. For that I'll stay none commital. But I was spoilt and did ride Mission One in Paris.
Perceived value is really in the eye of the beholder. Profound I know.Not to continue badgering you, but is this project worth the money? I.E. are we looking at New Fantasyland and Toy Story or Star Wars and Pandora? Obviously that's subjective, but I guess my question is do you think people will come off saying, "Wow, that was great", or "That was it?"
IMHO yes. Personally I'm more excited for TRON than Infinite Universe and that's saying something.
Rides gotta be quick. More rides a guest does, the happier they are. Gotta get 'em out of those pesky rides to buy souvenirs and eat junk.Thanks for recaping everything on this attraction. Seriously though this is really disappointing if plans are for a straight indoor coaster. I would much rather have a Six Flags queue area with just switchbacks and all the $$$ go inside the ride themeing, but seems like the powers above seems to think everyone and their brother wants elaborate 3 hour long queue lines with little substance with the actual ride itself.
One of the names yes.Is Infinite Universe the name of the GOTG coaster?
That Universe will require a lot of ........ENERGY!One of the names yes.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.