• Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.You can use your Twitter or Facebook account to sign up, or register directly.

Guardians of the Galaxy coming to Energy Pavilion at Epcot

Status
Not open for further replies.

jt04

Well-Known Member
Advertisement
Well, life's a bit@h ain't it?

I'm still critical of aspects of Pandora and Frozenstrom. Remember, average guests will like most things that you give them. You must have missed the spine proposal that I said was rather sleek. That usually means it's nice in case you didn't know. Just pointing out I do like things when I think they deserve it. Less you try and say otherwise.

Tell you what. You make your own contacts and we can discuss the things it seems you want to opinionate on.

Get back to me when you've done that.

BTW, when did you last visit?
I think it is fair to point out that what you think might not be great may be great to others specifically because we have no way to judge the information. And it should be considered in that light. In no way am I saying what you bring to the boards is not appreciated.
 

marni1971

WDW History nut
Premium Member
I think it is fair to point out that what you think might not be great may be great to others specifically because we have no way to judge the information.
That's right. You don't. Obviously it's in my opinion. I thought that went without saying. You're kind of stating the obvious.

At the end of the day I don't ask anyone to believe me or my opinion. That's an educated personal choice.
 
Last edited:

Kman101

Well-Known Member
And in terms of Frozen, it's not the godawful ride some make it out to be, but with the money likely spent on it, it deserved better. It's misplaced. And there's no reason they needed to keep the same rickety ride system. And no reason that it wasn't a new build. The ride itself would work if it say replaced Snow White's Scary Adventure, but it could have been a lot better. The animatronics are nice. It's not a total book report ride. But it could and should have been more (and I notice that I often say this about several new attractions they've built, which, while good and passable, could be a lot better if they didn't budget cut everything -- while still spending a heckuva lot of money). They have got to stop looking for quick fixes.

EDIT: Like with Rat (if it doesn't replace Impressions), Frozen could have been an EXTENSION of Norway (not ideal but still ...). No reason the meet and greet area also couldn't have housed a Frozen mini-land and ride. They could have updated Maelstrom to an epic tale about Vikings. They take the easy way out. That's why so many of us get frustrated. Especially when management knows these parks need ADDED capacity. They'd just rather move staff and budget from one attraction to the next instead of adding.
 

Magic Feather

Well-Known Member
@jt04 , FWiW, I know the plan @marni1971 was not that fond of, and I will admit, it has its negatives, but I did not find it to be as bad as Martin. Now, it still was far, far from the best plan, but that does go to show that there can be a difference of opinions. As of now, between the spine and energy projects having (some debatable) hope, the land refresh, the new dining: space, the new WS Pavillion, Rat, and a few others, EPCOT's future is looking brighter than initially expected.
 

FigmentForver96

Well-Known Member
@jt04 , FWiW, I know the plan @marni1971 was not that fond of, and I will admit, it has its negatives, but I did not find it to be as bad as Martin. Now, it still was far, far from the best plan, but that does go to show that there can be a difference of opinions. As of now, between the spine and energy projects having (some debatable) hope, the land refresh, the new dining: space, the new WS Pavillion, Rat, and a few others, EPCOT's future is looking brighter than initially expected.
Did you just drop a hint? :eek:
 

HMF

Well-Known Member
@jt04 , FWiW, I know the plan @marni1971 was not that fond of, and I will admit, it has its negatives, but I did not find it to be as bad as Martin. Now, it still was far, far from the best plan, but that does go to show that there can be a difference of opinions. As of now, between the spine and energy projects having (some debatable) hope, the land refresh, the new dining: space, the new WS Pavillion, Rat, and a few others, EPCOT's future is looking brighter than initially expected.
Brighter in terms of better than now or brighter as in going back to it's roots?
 

HMF

Well-Known Member
In my opinion, better than now. It won't be 1982. It'll be its own self. That's better than a hodgepodge like we have now.
I don't really want it to be 1982 I want the spirit that the park was founded on. Hope and optimism for the future. Something this world needs really badly right now. As long as it gives me the same feeling I had riding Spaceship Earth in 1999, I will be fine.
 

Magicart87

Well Known Member
Premium Member
@jt04 , FWiW, I know the plan @marni1971 was not that fond of, and I will admit, it has its negatives, but I did not find it to be as bad as Martin. Now, it still was far, far from the best plan, but that does go to show that there can be a difference of opinions. As of now, between the spine and energy projects having (some debatable) hope, the land refresh, the new dining: space, the new WS Pavillion, Rat, and a few others, EPCOT's future is looking brighter than initially expected.
Is the ":" a clue? Will the dining be located in Mission:Space?
 

cjkeating

Well-Known Member
@jt04 , FWiW, I know the plan @marni1971 was not that fond of, and I will admit, it has its negatives, but I did not find it to be as bad as Martin. Now, it still was far, far from the best plan, but that does go to show that there can be a difference of opinions. As of now, between the spine and energy projects having (some debatable) hope, the land refresh, the new dining: space, the new WS Pavillion, Rat, and a few others, EPCOT's future is looking brighter than initially expected.
Thanks for the summary... but why won't they do something about Imagination?!
 

pax_65

Well-Known Member
I don't really want it to be 1982 I want the spirit that the park was founded on. Hope and optimism for the future. Something this world needs really badly right now. As long as it gives me the same feeling I had riding Spaceship Earth in 1999, I will be fine.
^THIS - almost word for word what I was thinking. When you went to Epcot years ago, you came away thinking "Anything is possible, the future is so bright!" What do you feel now? "Soarin' is cool?", "Beer is good?", I just don't even know. I spend half my time in Futureworld remembering how the park used to be. :(
 

Movielover

Well-Known Member
^THIS - almost word for word what I was thinking. When you went to Epcot years ago, you came away thinking "Anything is possible, the future is so bright!" What do you feel now? "Soarin' is cool?", "Beer is good?", I just don't even know. I spend half my time in Futureworld remembering how the park used to be. :(
That's what the beer is for. The more you drink, the more Future world starts to look like a beautiful woman...
*burp!

Sorry what are we talking *hicup about?

:hungover:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom