WDW862
Well-Known Member
I dont think you're a school kid, or a troll, or a paid Disney blogger.
I just think you're opinions on this subject are worthless and should be ignored completely.
Lolk
I dont think you're a school kid, or a troll, or a paid Disney blogger.
I just think you're opinions on this subject are worthless and should be ignored completely.
There's no denying that it has some huge capacity issues.
If they do Gotg right, it will fit the theme of Epcot.
The Universe of Energy building is big enough to have a decent capacity.After what just happened with Frozen, I'm going to trust Disney on this one.
You guys are acting like Disney owes you something. The only group of people they do owe are the shareholders.
Phenomenal.The 'story' is they hosted a worlds fair in the 80's. Then let it rot like many major world fair/olympic-type venues tend to do. Then they gentrified it years later for a theme park.
The end. Pay-cheque please.
I don't think SWL would fit MK. However, as it is now DHS is the catch-all, for IP-based attractions. All IP's are movies so it fits in DHS.It'll still have the Hollywood theming upfront and will continue specifically celebrate the world of cinema. Do you honestly think that SWL would be a good fit for MK? I can assure you that the park will carry out a similar mission statement, but in the form of a full on theme park rather than that of a half theme park/ half long dead working studio.
Actually, Guardians needs to be a high demand average capacity ride. Something in the 1800 Guest per hour area. If it's too efficient it won't serve the purpose of drawing crowds away from Frozen.They can still do it right. If they choose to.
GOTG could be a high capacity ride they park needs, with the original FW theme, and Edutainment.
If they choose to.
Am I correct to assume that your Star Wars in Disneyland objection is the amount of space it's taking up? Did you have any issues with Star Tours or Indiana Jones Adventure in Disneyland?They wouldn't appreciate it. If it doesn't have a kewl movie tie-in, then they don't care.
Walt's park is being partially destroyed to shove Star Wars into it. It doesn't get any worse than that.
Why is it that many of the most popular and dare I say "classic" attractions don't have an intellectual property tied to them? Imagineers do some of their best work with a blank piece of paper.You guys also have to realize that what people find entertaining has changed. Disney has to adapt or die. Gotg will bring in more money than Universe of Energy, An updated, modern Misson Space could bring more money than Horizons did.
Disney is a publicly traded company and their 1# goal is about making money.
Totally agree. We as fans need to make our voices loud and clear that we love the parks because of their strong differences and don't want them to become uniform, soulless storage sheds where theme no longer matters.I don't think SWL would fit MK. However, as it is now DHS is the catch-all, for IP-based attractions. All IP's are movies so it fits in DHS.
I wish DHS could be the acquired IP park, (Pixar, Lucas, Marvel), but with GotG going to Epcot all hope is lost.
I liked it when Disney World had themed parks, not just themed attractions. When I walk down Sunset Blvd and find an authentic hotel, I get goosebumps, when I step to the left somehow Aerosmith is there.
Epcot/Future World needs innovation and technology, not IP's.
These decisions make Disney parks feel more like a business and less like a place where we can escape reality. The more people defend Disney by saying, "they're a business", the more they feel like a business.You guys are acting like Disney owes you something. The only group of people they do owe are the shareholders.
Quality has little to do with our argument. In a vacuum Frozen Ever After is a well done ride. Of course when you factor in the thematic break and operational nightmare it's the worst attraction decision in the history of Walt Disney World. That's not hyperbole. That's not opinion. That's a fact.Who said GOTG won't be high quality? Frozen is great quality and will for sure make Epcot tons of money.
Bob IgerWho is the lead imagineer for Epcot projects?
I think they were talking about Groot.Wasn't there some overhyped press release a few years ago about how he was going to return Epcot to its roots?
There sure is a lot of the sky is falling over a rumor that hasn't been confirmed yet. I believe @marni1971 that something is coming. Has GOTG been confirmed? No. Take a breath, people.
Not just Marni. Every insider we have here is saying the same thing.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.