Frozen ride replacing Maelstrom?

Status
Not open for further replies.

StarWarsGirl

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
SWL will probably be in DL, not WDW first, and itll be the same thing at Carsland, Lets keep it original to one park please.....
And where exactly do you think they will put it?

No offense to Disneyland people; I love Disneyland, but WDW is in need of rides and attractions.

Yet, why are we talking about this on this thread? we should open another about WDW carsland and DL or WDW starwars land
It's how it works when we get into these longer threads. We get off topic and people jump in.
 

MonorailLover

Well-Known Member
You know, it just belongs in Fantasyland. If they can build an incredibly long queue for Indiana Jones Adventure at Disneyland, and no one complains about it, they can certainly build a lengthy queue to get to an attraction built on available land.

You got it!!!!!
 

MonorailLover

Well-Known Member
And where exactly do you think they will put it?

No offense to Disneyland people; I love Disneyland, but WDW is in need of rides and attractions.


It's how it works when we get into these longer threads. We get off topic and people jump in.

Trust me, I'm a WDW fan more than DL, I just don't think it'll happen at least after avatar lands done
 

StarWarsGirl

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
Well, they just purchased a new place for CM parking, which used to be next to the parks, which gives some land, not sure how much... But it's a start. They'll find it if they need it...
I just think it fits the theming at Studios a lot better, plus they've got space. They could build it around Star Tours (another thing, why have a Star Wars attraction in Tomorrowland and then put a land elsewhere?). They could knock out the Muppets area and/or LMA and put it there.
 

MonorailLover

Well-Known Member
I just think it fits the theming at Studios a lot better, plus they've got space. They could build it around Star Tours (another thing, why have a Star Wars attraction in Tomorrowland and then put a land elsewhere?). They could knock out the Muppets area and/or LMA and put it there.

I agree, I just think it'll take a bit for imagineers to think about the rides and then move the workforce from avatar land to SWL when finished.
 

StarWarsGirl

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
You know, it just belongs in Fantasyland. If they can build an incredibly long queue for Indiana Jones Adventure at Disneyland, and no one complains about it, they can certainly build a lengthy queue to get to an attraction built on available land.
I agree. Maelstrom is still a popular ride even though I don't get why. I think they can figure out how to put it in FL.
 

NoChesterHester

Well-Known Member
I just think it fits the theming at Studios a lot better, plus they've got space. They could build it around Star Tours (another thing, why have a Star Wars attraction in Tomorrowland and then put a land elsewhere?). They could knock out the Muppets area and/or LMA and put it there.

What the theming in the Studios?

Putting Frozen in the Studios will further destroy the cohesiveness of this once great theme park. It was never intended to be the park where things get dumped that don't fit in elsewhere.
 

Voxel

President of Progress City
What the theming in the Studios?

Putting Frozen in the Studios will further destroy the cohesiveness of this once great theme park. It was never intended to be the park where things get dumped that don't fit in elsewhere.
I always held hope that with the rising production cost of California that efforts would be moved back to Hollywood Studios.
 

NoChesterHester

Well-Known Member
I always held hope that with the rising production cost of California that efforts would be moved back to Hollywood Studios.

That was the thought in the 80's. It never materialized. The issue was relocating the talent. That proved to be more expensive and more emotionally difficult than they could have ever imagined.

I liken it to believing that you could create a defense research triangle out of the blue in somewhere like Oxford Mississippi. Sure it is a nice place, but where is all the brain talent going to come from?
 

StarWarsGirl

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
What the theming in the Studios?

Putting Frozen in the Studios will further destroy the cohesiveness of this once great theme park. It was never intended to be the park where things get dumped that don't fit in elsewhere.
Oh, we were talking about Star Wars Land, not Frozen! Off topic a bit. Sorry for the confusion:rolleyes:
 

Voxel

President of Progress City
That was the thought in the 80's. It never materialized. The issue was relocating the talent. That proved to be more expensive and more emotionally difficult than they could have ever imagined.

I liken it to believing that you could create a defense research triangle out of the blue in somewhere like Oxford Mississippi. Sure it is a nice place, but where is all the brain talent going to come from?
This is very true. It just makes sense more and more esp. with Disney doing more productions in North Carolina and Georgia. We can dream though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom