DinoInstitute
Well-Known Member
*dammit* Again?!All Scots have red hair and wear tartan. And if they don't, they are not true Scotsmen.
*dammit* Again?!All Scots have red hair and wear tartan. And if they don't, they are not true Scotsmen.
Somebody tell that guy about the UK pavilion.
First, I seriously doubt that they were ever going to have a UK pavilion and a Scotland pavilion (outside of F&W food stands, that is). That would be like having a Canadian pavilion and a New Brunswick pavilion. Not going to happen.Why? Disney has courted Scotland in the past to add its own pavilion, despite the fact of the UK pavilion there. Same with Norway,,Denmark was close to being added after it as well, in the 90s.
First, I seriously doubt that they were ever going to have a UK pavilion and a Scotland pavilion (outside of F&W food stands, that is). That would be like having a Canadian pavilion and a New Brunswick pavilion. Not going to happen.
Second, Norway and Denmark are distinct sovereign countries.
Brave is racist, because the evil bear was a black bear, and that's a stereotype! You never see an evil polar bear in movies! Those polar bears are always depicted as cute and frolicking and drinking delicious Coke products! Why can't a black bear frolic and enjoy a delicious soft drink?!?
Not a movie, but evil Polar bears do exist!
A search found the occasional post by you suggesting a Scotland pavilion then someone reminding you that they are part of the UK and then you claiming that there used to be a rumor of a Scotland pavilion. It didn't actually turn up a discussion about an interest by the company in adding a Scotland pavilion.Aren't you the one with all the answers. Whether you like it or not, it was very much discussed and thought about at one time. No its not going to happen, but it could have. Now back to Norway and Maelstrom.
Few of the characters in the actual movie had red hair. Fergus and his children did. It isn't really uncommon for hair color to pass down, of course.
They wore tartans in the movie. Big deal.
I read somewhere that bears went extinct in Scotland around the end of the first millenium. That's a far cry from 'prehistoric'.
I think that the movie's timeframe would predate French in Scotland, but who cares? This is a Disney movie. The characters are going to be speaking English.
I think that you are trying too hard to find racism, but I guess that if you really want to find racism, you'll find it anywhere you look, right?
Wow. All that because a kids' movie made primarily for the American market has the characters speaking English.I see, youll be telling me folk who get offended by sports teams names are backward next.
But surely as an expert on everything youd know that one of our most famous Kings was a Norman French speaker as most nobility were at that time and the clue may be in the term, the auld alliance, in fact I find it difficult to place a time frame when the folk as depicted wouldnt be speaking a language alien to me. But then teuchters are a strange breed I blame their intimacy with sheep.
If you are happy to swallow brother bear with skirts,well its Disney so we shouldnt be surprised, good for you. Some of us would prefer a proper entertaining story based on something from our rich literary past, not hoaching with clichés and lazy narrowly defined imagery and cause lets be honest theres plenty of a past to provide inspiration.
Wow. All that because a kids' movie made primarily for the American market has the characters speaking English.
Of course you are correct. That's racism at its most devilish.
(It should be noted that the movie obviously took place several hundred years prior to the 'auld alliance'; perhaps as much as a thousand years. This is known both because there were bears and to fit the Lord's claims and Merida's speech to the clans.)
Well, depending how the vote in September goes, Scotland could be its own distinct sovereign country as well:First, I seriously doubt that they were ever going to have a UK pavilion and a Scotland pavilion (outside of F&W food stands, that is). That would be like having a Canadian pavilion and a New Brunswick pavilion. Not going to happen.
Second, Norway and Denmark are distinct sovereign countries.
You are correct. Kilts are anachronistic in this movie. That doesn't make it racist, however.Your just gagging for the bears part to be true, the only bears youll find in the time of kilts is the bevvy merchants still roaming the country today.
Why do you keep bringing up sports teams? How is that making your point?It should be noted that you are correct it was made for the American market, which would explain a lot. Luckily no sports teams involved.
Is it wrong that I read this in Billy Connolly's voice?I see, youll be telling me folk who get offended by sports teams names are backward next.
But surely as an expert on everything youd know that one of our most famous Kings was a Norman French speaker as most nobility were at that time and the clue may be in the term, the auld alliance, in fact I find it difficult to place a time frame when the folk as depicted wouldnt be speaking a language alien to me. But then teuchters are a strange breed I blame their intimacy with sheep.
If you are happy to swallow brother bear with skirts,well its Disney so we shouldnt be surprised, good for you. Some of us would prefer a proper entertaining story based on something from our rich literary past, not hoaching with clichés and lazy narrowly defined imagery and cause lets be honest theres plenty of a past to provide inspiration.
Is it wrong that I read this in Billy Connolly's voice?
Heck, Arendelle as its own LAND could be a cash cow.
To be fair, it's mostly the same people complaining about it over and over.
Also, when people refer to 'the masses', they are generally talking about the general population, not a super small sliver of the population.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.