A couple of those have actually made it to private collections one way or another! If they’re as magic as they said they were though, they could be used around the park to undo some of the ugly paint jobsI'd love to know what the bubble writers could have been used fo elsewhere
Remember, the current ride was originally a "temporary fix" when it debuted in '02, which will be *20 YEARS AGO* in 6 months.I think a simple and temporary fix that would put a little life in the pavilion again while we continue to wait for a new attraction, which has to come eventually even if it's not what we want, would be to clean the pyramids, repaint the building to be pastel blues and purples (or, at the very least, move away from the Kodak colors as its been over 10 years since they sponsored the pavilion), and put a new show in the Magic Eye Theatre. I don't know why they haven't already, it's a cheap(er) way to put life into an existing building and it would be something fairly marketable, especially on park maps, bus ads, and the genie app, and would bring in more foot traffic towards that side of the park where guests can buy flavored popcorn and Figment merch.
Insulting?New holiday merch is out with Dreamfinder represented alongside Figment.
Absolutely insulting.
It’s insulting that he’s only recognized as an easy way to sell merch to fans, but Disney wouldn’t dare put any of that revenue towards actually returning him to the attraction that he’s associated with.Insulting?
I'm happy they still recognize Dreamfinder as a character.
Attractions change. I don’t think this rises to the level of an insult. They still use Mr. Toad, the Nautilus, and other things this way as well. Sure, it trades on nostalgia, and the Imagination pavilion deserves much better care than it currently receives. Still, even if Dreamfinder never returns, I don’t see the problem with selling merchandise related to him.It’s insulting that he’s only recognized as an easy way to sell merch to fans, but Disney wouldn’t dare put any of that revenue towards actually returning him to the attraction that he’s associated with.
The problem is there’s no specific merch for the current ride, sure there’s Figment plush but Disney’s not selling any Imagination Institute shirts or anything else branded similarly. Disney knows they can still keep the terrible current ride and pander to the fans of the original with shallow merchandise callbacks. The scary part is they’ve been getting away with it. It’s probably gone on a little too long to be explained as Disney seeing if there’s still any interest in the character.Attractions change. I don’t think this rises to the level of an insult. They still use Mr. Toad, the Nautilus, and other things this way as well. Sure, it trades on nostalgia, and the Imagination pavilion deserves much better care than it currently receives. Still, even if Dreamfinder never returns, I don’t see the problem with selling merchandise related to him.
Oh I’m not surprised at all, it’s just dissapointing to see people eat this stuff up while the ride just rots.I just fail to see why that's "scary". He is among the ranks of many other retired characters they feature in merchandise. Taking advantage of nostalgia related to Dreamfinder is neither unique nor surprising.
People like to imagine the Disney Archives are a massive repository for any and all things that may have factored into the history of the parks . . . but the truth is they are very selective about what they take in, and artifacts have to be deemed as having some pretty extreme historic value to the company in order to be accepted.Most of the stuff from the OG ImageWorks were moved to the Walt Disney Archives I believe?
My guess would moreso be stuff like blueprints, plans, photo/video/audio archives of the stuff used for those activities rather than full physical items.People like to imagine the Disney Archives are a massive repository for any and all things that may have factored into the history of the parks . . . but the truth is they are very selective about what they take in, and artifacts have to be deemed as having some pretty extreme historic value to the company in order to be accepted.
The liklihood that the Archives has anything of note from the original Image Works is low, and if they do it would probably be one or two pieces at most.
It is more likely that elements like that exist on file, yes.My guess would moreso be stuff like blueprints, plans, photo/video/audio archives of the stuff used for those activities rather than full physical items.
I'm sure there will be a programmable instagram wall that can be used to pretend they brought it back and rotate through different settings. But I don't hold out much hope for a full rendition.I just want a picture in the rainbow tunnel A part of me keeps hoping that we'll see it return when the Play! Pavilion opens...whenever that is...
People like to imagine the Disney Archives are a massive repository for any and all things that may have factored into the history of the parks . . . but the truth is they are very selective about what they take in, and artifacts have to be deemed as having some pretty extreme historic value to the company in order to be accepted.
The liklihood that the Archives has anything of note from the original Image Works is low, and if they do it would probably be one or two pieces at most.
We can only hope, for we'll never really know for sure if they moved to the archives.After it closed, several items in the old ImageWorks were tagged by Archives as having significant historical importance to the company and were planned for inclusion.
Buzzy, anyone?We can only hope, for we'll never really know for sure if they moved to the archives.
Some small animatronics were tagged from Horizons too, but who knows if they survived.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.