Insider - - I'm not trying to sound like a complaining machine when I denounce the new ride. Rather, I'm trying to express how it is a failure (i.e. there is never a wait).
If this is all about Figment, the ride even has Figment's name on it, and it's failing.
There's something beyond the name. . . and that's the spirit of the attraction. The spirit of the original happened to be that balance of the two. Yes, Figment was the star, but the pavilion is a disaster without that spirit.
And a lot of us relate that spirit to Dreamfinder. i.e. the Meet and Greets weren't autograph signing. They were truly experiences. And I'm sure I have the right to complain if Disney's being cheap about making a meet'n'greet so that they can make money off photographs rather than bringing back that experience.
The same goes for the quality of the ride (black curtains on the wall are inexcusable - although this WAS better than 2.0), and as mentioned, the Image Works. There is something obviously wrong with this picture: Imagination is supposed to be what Disney stands for, but the company has become so unfocused as to let it rot away.
And, based on the current state of the pavilion, it will, in time, have to change again. And in the long run, Disney would have had to pay more money changing it than they could have spent making it better than it was even from its original form.
Back in the 1980s and up to 1998, the original ride was heavily populated by fans who loved the Imagination attraction. It was a great experience, highly budgeted, with great attention to song, show, and detail.
At least the spirit could be brought back.
So back to the connection to the thread, why NOT use Dreamfinder in this meet and greet?