cookiee_munster
Well-Known Member
I think Splash works because people don't associate it with Song of the South. It was a win for Disney because they could introduce something new to this generation without having to take the time or $$$ to invent new characters. For many, those characters exist only in Splash Mountain thus it is almost the equivalent of an "original" attraction. Avatar on the other hand, is widely known and the reaction is divisive. To me it is too much of a flash in the pan, flavor of the month type of property...and even worse it is last month's flavor of the month. Because it was such a pop culture phenomenon, its popularity has spiked and now plummeted. It is now "cool to hate it". Releasing an attraction based on Avatar in 5 years from now is the theme park equivalent to releasing a remix of "Gangnam Style" in half a decade.
excellent post there. i really am hoping that eventually the avatarland concept will just fizzle out and die and they'll go on to something different. beastly kingdom really does need to be brought back onto the drawing board and revised quite a bit. give it more of a European theme with forests and woodland creatures etc as well as creatures of myth/legend. leave out the Grecian and topiary castle areas.