Chi84
Premium Member
You're right - I deleted my part in it. No one needs to read that nonsense. Thanks for the reminder.Let it go you two
You're right - I deleted my part in it. No one needs to read that nonsense. Thanks for the reminder.Let it go you two
I would not take that article as gospel. I want FP back too, but you need look at what they did and then think what you can I do to get around it outside of their comparisons criteria for the article, a couple things come to mind actually. They were comparing their plans in a certain way based on historical data. People need use that site as a basis not gospel. I have been at touringlans since inception and many times other methods of approaching the parks on particular days is much better than what they advise in general.This is absolutely what I'm expecting. So if FP+ doesn't return, and you're an off site guest, your only options will be spend an inordinate amount of time in line, or spend an inordinate amount of money to not stand in line.
I think people on here severely overestimate the amount of people who go to WDW more often than once every few years.Yes but I bet those are **day** trips. Whereas people stay at WDW resort for a week at a time, often more then once a year. It's not comparable.
you make plenty of assumptions here, you have no idea as to how people are paying for the WDW trip and whether some % are doing so by going into debt, and you also have no way of knowing WDW is intentionally target such people. My guess is that you might be surprised at the ability to pay, and you would have no idea by looking at those at WDW to know how they can afford.You are not their target customer because you are financially responsible. They target people willing to go into ridiculous credit card debt to pay for their "vacation of a lifetime" and deal with the consequences later. I'd actually be interested to know what percentage of the "once in a lifetime" WDW guests files for bankruptcy protection within two years of their trip.
That's why it has been impossible to control crowds (pre-COVID) by raising prices to astronomical levels. There is a segment of the population that will pay anything for a trip to WDW, even if it means going into unsustainable debt.
no one on here knows what any specifics are-its all speculationI know there are no specifics out there yet but is the option of keeping the original 3 free FP’s for resort guests & then charging for ability to book more afterwards on the table? Also paying up ahead of time for more. So on & so forth… Probably a pipe dream but seems like a good way to keep everyone happy once they roll things out.
thanks, really crowded up this threadYou're right - I deleted my part in it. No one needs to read that nonsense. Thanks for the reminder.
no perks? well I'd say the actually stay I hae planned at the Poly is a perk (better than some offsite place)I still stand by the statement that they are not going to reduce inventory by much from FP+ to make as much money as possible on it.
Also, right now as we speak, there is not a single perk to staying on site. Seriously, not one.
I would be very shocked if there is not a limited free tier for some or all resort guests. Cannot compare it to DLR; WDW has 28 resorts. That's a lot of rooms to fill and there needs to be a reason for guests to stay there at the rates they are charging.
There are no theme park benefits afforded to people staying on property. Liking a resort more than another one isn't a perk, it's a preference. Many people prefer off site resorts to on site resorts.no perks? well I'd say the actually stay I hae planned at the Poly is a perk (better than some offsite place)
Early entry is a perk. What if they gave onsite guests 1 FP per day. Would that be good enough?I still stand by the statement that they are not going to reduce inventory by much from FP+ to make as much money as possible on it.
Also, right now as we speak, there is not a single perk to staying on site. Seriously, not one.
I would be very shocked if there is not a limited free tier for some or all resort guests. Cannot compare it to DLR; WDW has 28 resorts. That's a lot of rooms to fill and there needs to be a reason for guests to stay there at the rates they are charging.
Early Theme Park Entry hasn't started yet. If it has, it has unofficially.Early entry is a perk. What if they gave onsite guests 1 FP per day. Would that be good enough?
Early entry for resort guests hasn’t started yet.Early entry is a perk. What if they gave onsite guests 1 FP per day. Would that be good enough?
Also, right now as we speak, there is not a single perk to staying on site. Seriously, not one.
To be fair, isn’t transportation still a perk? It’s hard to beat the convenience of Disney transportation…. The fact that the Swan / Dolphin no longer uses the Disney Bus system makes me significantly less likely to stay there.Also, right now as we speak, there is not a single perk to staying on site. Seriously, not one.
being right across the water from MK is a perkThere are no theme park benefits afforded to people staying on property. Liking a resort more than another one isn't a perk, it's a preference. Many people prefer off site resorts to on site resorts.
You pay an exorbitant amount of money for that. It's not a perk. A perk is a special right due to some affiliation. As I said, there are no theme park perks offered to resort guests right now.being right across the water from MK is a perk
Depends on your opinion of the current state of WDW transportationTo be fair, isn’t transportation still a perk? It’s hard to beat the convenience of Disney transportation…. The fact that the Swan / Dolphin no longer uses the Disney Bus system makes me significantly less likely to stay there.
I’m not saying that should be the only perk, and I’m pretty upset about the perks that Disney is getting rid of, but Disney transportation is definitely a solid benefit, at least IMO.
I guess we'll agree to disagreeYou pay an exorbitant amount of money for that. It's not a perk. A perk is a special right due to some affiliation. As I said, there are no theme park perks offered to resort guests right now.
I guess we'll agree to disagree
I don't think we disagree though. I'm not saying there isn't a reason to stay on property. I still think it's worth staying on property for the reasons you mentioned (I like the resorts a lot and the proximity is worth something). I am talking about historical theme park perks associated with staying at one of their resorts. Right now, there aren't any. That's all.I guess we'll agree to disagree
There is an inherent benefit to staying at Poly, GF, and Contemporary based on their proximity to the Magic Kingdom and being on the monorail to access Epcot. If you don't want to call this a perk, ok, whatever, but you're splitting hairs. But it's something you do not get by staying off property or at a less expensive Disney property that many find worth the expense to get that benefit (perk).You pay an exorbitant amount of money for that. It's not a perk. A perk is a special right due to some affiliation. As I said, there are no theme park perks offered to resort guests right now.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.