stainofmind
New Member
There's always exceptions to generalizations. You seem to be one of them, and I know I applaud you. :sohappy:
All one has to do is look at pictures of the parks from ten to twenty years ago and realize that strollers were not as abundant as they are now. Heck, you never saw scooters either.
I wasn't really trying to point myself out as an exception to the generalization (that would seem like tooting my own horn) as much as I was trying to convince people to avoid generalizations, in general. Until you do an in-depth analysis, one really doesn't know why people are seemingly using strollers more than they used to (I don't even know this to be fact). Could it even be due to a higher attendance (I don't know attendance statistics)? I mean, there are nearly 7 billion people on this planet, so you can indeed expect more people to be using strollers now than in 1980 when there were 4.5 billion people on this planet. It doesn't necessarily reflect a "lazier" world (or some other generalization) that we're living in.
Some things are evolved improvements in lifestyle, not a downgrade. Would it make sense for us at this point to give up cell phones, for example?